Difference between revisions of "Talk:Breast"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Article scope) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
How about taking out everything unrelated to lactation and putting it in a new article about [[public mores]] or [[Nudity]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 20:14, 16 April 2007 (EDT) | How about taking out everything unrelated to lactation and putting it in a new article about [[public mores]] or [[Nudity]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 20:14, 16 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Good idea. That way, it can all be deleted at once. --[[User:BobD|BobD]] 20:31, 16 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:31, April 17, 2007
Doesn't the mother's breast express love for her baby, when she cuddles it? --Ed Poor 19:04, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
- Of course. At the moment this article seems to me to be a little bit on the prurient side... Dpbsmith 19:13, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
- I can't consider myself qualified to write on the maternal aspects, perhaps somebody who is could add some appropriate remarks? --Jeremiah4-22 19:25, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
Usage
I notice that in the first ordinary dictionary I checked, the primary meaning is a single mammary gland and the secondary meaning is the upper chest, whereas in a 1981 medical dictionary, it is exactly the other way around... Dpbsmith 19:13, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
Article scope
How about taking out everything unrelated to lactation and putting it in a new article about public mores or Nudity. --Ed Poor 20:14, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
- Good idea. That way, it can all be deleted at once. --BobD 20:31, 16 April 2007 (EDT)