Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bill Richardson"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The statement, "Iowa, for good reason, for constitutional reasons, for reasons related to the Lord, should be the first caucus and primary.", was a joke and shouldn't be treated so seriously. | The statement, "Iowa, for good reason, for constitutional reasons, for reasons related to the Lord, should be the first caucus and primary.", was a joke and shouldn't be treated so seriously. | ||
| − | :::I quote: ''"Although Richardson has no historic connection to the [[Latino]] population of the U.S. (his mother was from Mexico),...)"'' Why did Richardson have no "historic connection" to his mother? I thought we all have historic connections to our mothers. Even Democrats.{{unsigned}} | + | :::I quote: ''"Although Richardson has no historic connection to the [[Latino]] population of the U.S. (his mother was from Mexico),...)"'' Why did Richardson have no "historic connection" to his mother? I thought we all have historic connections to our mothers. Even Democrats.{{unsigned}} [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 02:19, 8 February 2013 (EST) |
::::Well, the statement speaks for itself; the Hispanic population (a multitude) is not his mother (an individual). [[User:OscarO|OscarO]] 01:43, 8 February 2013 (EST) | ::::Well, the statement speaks for itself; the Hispanic population (a multitude) is not his mother (an individual). [[User:OscarO|OscarO]] 01:43, 8 February 2013 (EST) | ||
| + | :::::I have an historic connection to the convict heritage of Australia through my father's grandfather, transported in 1827. I have an historic connection to Ireland because of my father's grandmother, who migrated as a free settler from County Cork in 1835. I have a further historic connection to Britain (and Yorkshire in particular) because of my mother who met and married my father in Ceylon (Sri Lanka) during WWII when they were serving their respective countries. I therefore have an historic connection to all Brits and Irish and Welsh (my name is Evans) who have come to this country. Richardson's mother is/was Mexican and therefore part of the Latino population, therefore he, Richardson, is half Latino. Ergo, he is connected to the Latino population. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 02:19, 8 February 2013 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 07:19, February 8, 2013
Recommend
Conservapedia:Manual of Style/Politicians - Myk 02:23, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
Is it balanced?
I think this article could use some balancing out. -Additioner 20:32, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
- The article is not protected; since you're an editor... make the changes. --Crocoite 20:36, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
The statement, "Iowa, for good reason, for constitutional reasons, for reasons related to the Lord, should be the first caucus and primary.", was a joke and shouldn't be treated so seriously.
- I quote: "Although Richardson has no historic connection to the Latino population of the U.S. (his mother was from Mexico),...)" Why did Richardson have no "historic connection" to his mother? I thought we all have historic connections to our mothers. Even Democrats.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] [[User talk:{{{1}}}|(talk)]] AlanE 02:19, 8 February 2013 (EST)
- Well, the statement speaks for itself; the Hispanic population (a multitude) is not his mother (an individual). OscarO 01:43, 8 February 2013 (EST)
- I have an historic connection to the convict heritage of Australia through my father's grandfather, transported in 1827. I have an historic connection to Ireland because of my father's grandmother, who migrated as a free settler from County Cork in 1835. I have a further historic connection to Britain (and Yorkshire in particular) because of my mother who met and married my father in Ceylon (Sri Lanka) during WWII when they were serving their respective countries. I therefore have an historic connection to all Brits and Irish and Welsh (my name is Evans) who have come to this country. Richardson's mother is/was Mexican and therefore part of the Latino population, therefore he, Richardson, is half Latino. Ergo, he is connected to the Latino population. AlanE 02:19, 8 February 2013 (EST)
- Well, the statement speaks for itself; the Hispanic population (a multitude) is not his mother (an individual). OscarO 01:43, 8 February 2013 (EST)
- I quote: "Although Richardson has no historic connection to the Latino population of the U.S. (his mother was from Mexico),...)" Why did Richardson have no "historic connection" to his mother? I thought we all have historic connections to our mothers. Even Democrats.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] [[User talk:{{{1}}}|(talk)]] AlanE 02:19, 8 February 2013 (EST)