User talk:OscarO
Welcome!
Hello, OscarO, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, OscarO!
Contents
Libyan war, chronology.
Hey, I see you just added a citation to the Libyan War article from the 'new york times' about an ansar al-sharia leader talking to the paper from benghazi. I just looked through teh article and it looked to me as though they were talking about a day after the attack, which would not invalidate the other reports that say that they are no longer in the city, as the events those reports are referring to took place 10 days later. I might have missed something there though, but check it out anyway. thanks, Cmurphynz 23:50, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
- The New York Times reported, as recently as only 10 days ago (Oct. 15, 2012), "...Ahmed Abu Khattala and Mohammed Ali Zahawi, fought alongside other commanders against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi. Their group [Ansar al-Sharia] provides [present tense] social services and guards [again, present tense] a hospital. And they openly proselytize for their brand of puritanical Islam and political vision. " [1] OscarO 14:02, 28 October 2012 (EDT)
- Ok, I see it now.Cmurphynz 20:22, 7 November 2012 (EST)
Edit overwrite mistake
Sorry about mistakenly overwriting your edit on Talk:Main Page. I was in the process of restoring it when I saw that you already restored it.--Andy Schlafly 19:02, 4 January 2013 (EST)
- Thanks. I should have vetted that source better. It was tabloid, so I got sookered. OscarO 19:07, 4 January 2013 (EST)
Obama
I think it might be worth considering if we need two articles on Sequestration, or if we should use a merge and redirect scheme. I don't have a made up mind either way, but I thought it might be worth talking about. Your thoughts? Thanks, WilliamWB 15:25, 2 March 2013 (EST)
- I'm beginning to loose count how many there are (see post at Talk/MP). Yes, it is a problem. The main sequestration article is in category legal terms, so fixing sequester & sequestration should begin there, w/redirs to a disambig, don't you think? OscarO 15:30, 2 March 2013 (EST)
- I think the legal term usage is relatively unimportant and should be folded in to the article itself--my thought would be that the usage of the term is going to be limited to this event. I will participate in the other discussions. WilliamWB 18:23, 2 March 2013 (EST)
- This current law has been around since 1986. Previously it was called impoundment. Both Reagan & Clinton wanted some form of line-item veto, and sequester is what they got. I'm not sure if both Reagan & Clinton used it, though. OscarO 03:39, 3 March 2013 (EST)
- I think the legal term usage is relatively unimportant and should be folded in to the article itself--my thought would be that the usage of the term is going to be limited to this event. I will participate in the other discussions. WilliamWB 18:23, 2 March 2013 (EST)
Recession of 2008
Please, why deleting so much in that article? --Joaquín Martínez 20:07, 23 March 2013 (EDT)
- Which parts? There's very little actually removed; I've brought most upto date to sound more current, and added parts were it was only speculative as about what was likely to happen in the near future (the article has not been edited much since Nov, 2009). OscarO 20:12, 23 March 2013 (EDT)
- Fine! Thanks. --Joaquín Martínez 20:21, 23 March 2013 (EDT)
Libyan Islamic Fighting Group
Hi I see you are writing on articles like War in Libya or Civil War in Syria. So can you expand the article Libyan Islamic Fighting Group please? --Alex00 12:03, 30 March 2013 (EDT)
- I could try; The group is largely a creation of the US to mask it's real identities (Ansar al-Shariah, etc.) OscarO 12:06, 30 March 2013 (EDT)
quick note
I featured the article: Riots during the Obama Administration on the main page. If you haven't done so already, I would add Soros related content to Ferguson section.
I started working on your other requests. Conservative 05:51, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- I left a message for you at: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Community_Portal#To:_RobS.2FOscarO 05:55, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- While I am working on getting you picture upload rights, one of the people to ask to upload pictures is User:Joaquín Martínez. He wants RobSmith to be made an admin again too. Conservative 06:04, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- If you want to increase the odds of the RobSmith account being given admin rights, stop editing RW and edit CP more. Karajou, JPatt and TerryH are not big RW fans and Andy does value their input. Conservative 07:41, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- Regarding your request, please communicate directly to Andy via his talk page or via his email. I do know that he always liked your web content.
- If you want to increase the odds of the RobSmith account being given admin rights, stop editing RW and edit CP more. Karajou, JPatt and TerryH are not big RW fans and Andy does value their input. Conservative 07:41, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- While I am working on getting you picture upload rights, one of the people to ask to upload pictures is User:Joaquín Martínez. He wants RobSmith to be made an admin again too. Conservative 06:04, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- Also, did you get my email? Would you like to communicate via email? Conservative 17:54, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
I read a message to you at another wiki. It said, "RW is a broad community so stop trying to justify yourself."
It is a broad community as long as you toe the secular leftist line. :) Try posting your Obama administration and rioting article at RW and see if it is featured on their main page. :) Conservative 19:20, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
Study on violent riots and backlash
Study: Violent '60s Protests Triggered Rise in Conservative Voting
I hope this information is helpful to you.Conservative 06:19, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
