Difference between revisions of "Proposition 23"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(expanded a bit) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Proposition 23''' would suspend an anti-[[free enterprise]] law (AB 32) of [[California]] as long as [[unemployment]] in the state averages above 5.5 percent for any quarter during a one-year period. AB 32 embraces theories of [[global warming]] and gives preferences to less efficient "renewable" or green energy production. It also creates a market for special rights to trade greenhouse gases, with which insiders could make millions or even billions of dollars. | + | '''Proposition 23''' would suspend an anti-[[free enterprise]] law (AB 32) of [[California]] as long as [[unemployment]] in the state averages above 5.5 percent for any quarter during a one-year period. AB 32 embraces theories of [[global warming]], limits helpful energy production and use, and gives preferences to less efficient "renewable" or green energy production. It also creates a market for special rights to trade greenhouse gases, with which insiders could make millions or even billions of dollars. |
'''Proposition 23''' is on the ballot in the general election of 2010. | '''Proposition 23''' is on the ballot in the general election of 2010. | ||
[[Category:politics]] | [[Category:politics]] | ||
Revision as of 01:59, October 23, 2010
Proposition 23 would suspend an anti-free enterprise law (AB 32) of California as long as unemployment in the state averages above 5.5 percent for any quarter during a one-year period. AB 32 embraces theories of global warming, limits helpful energy production and use, and gives preferences to less efficient "renewable" or green energy production. It also creates a market for special rights to trade greenhouse gases, with which insiders could make millions or even billions of dollars.
Proposition 23 is on the ballot in the general election of 2010.