Difference between revisions of "User:TK"
m |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{|cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" style="border:8px solid yellow; background-color:#191983;" | {|cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" style="border:8px solid yellow; background-color:#191983;" | ||
|<font color=white><b>Welcome To TK's User Page. I am An Administrator For Conservapedia. Please Post Any Messages On My Talk Page.<br><small>You Can IM Me--Exculpatory1 On AIM / CPSysop_TK On Yahoo Messenger, or email through the wiki using the link to the left, or exculpatory1@aim.com, If You Need Help Or Assistance.</small> | |<font color=white><b>Welcome To TK's User Page. I am An Administrator For Conservapedia. Please Post Any Messages On My Talk Page.<br><small>You Can IM Me--Exculpatory1 On AIM / CPSysop_TK On Yahoo Messenger, or email through the wiki using the link to the left, or exculpatory1@aim.com, If You Need Help Or Assistance.</small> | ||
| − | |||
|} | |} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{cquote|'''"Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that...Fox News" <small>-- Denny Crane</small>'''}} | {{cquote|'''"Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that...Fox News" <small>-- Denny Crane</small>'''}} | ||
| − | |||
{{Userboxtop|User TK/Terry}} | {{Userboxtop|User TK/Terry}} | ||
| − | {{Userbox|white|yellow|12, | + | {{Userbox|white|yellow|12,500|This user has made over 12,500 edits to Conservapedia}} |
{{User CPLeader|[[user:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]}} | {{User CPLeader|[[user:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]}} | ||
{{User Sysop}} | {{User Sysop}} | ||
| Line 32: | Line 22: | ||
<br /><br /> | <br /><br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| + | == '''3,900 pages watched ''not counting talk pages''.''' == | ||
| + | <br /> | ||
| + | == '''My Blocking Policy:''' == | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''True wikis have simple, clear rules. Otherwise it is a mobocracy and Conservapedia and its Founder has explicitly rejected mob rule, and has Administrators to decide its policy.''' | ||
| + | '''''A person who stops by merely to ridicule and denigrate others scholarly efforts, without at least trying to make positive contributions to this project, cannot have a "point" other than to disrupt and waste the time of sincere contributors and Administrators.''''' | ||
| + | '''If a person comes to Conservapedia knowing full well it is a conservative/Christian friendly wiki-encyclopedia, and is a liberal, the question is why? If the answer is they support Andy Schlafly's idea of intellectual freedom, of a Conservative & Christian-friendly alternative to the decidedly left-of-center, editor dominated Wikipedia, that's great! All voices should be represented on the Net. But if their intentions are merely to argue and dispute Conservative or Christian points of view, that becomes a form of vandalism, inasmuch as it is a great time waster and distraction for those who genuinely want to contribute, and build this encyclopedia.''' | ||
| − | + | '''Those who obsessively create new user names, only to argue against our values, and do not make an effort to substantially contribute, are actually terrorists of the Internet kind. What other reason would they have to stick around, arguing and wasting our time? Any board or wiki has the absolute right of free association.''' | |
| + | '''I am not for truncating free speech automatically, but after days or weeks of disputing everything, knowing you are not going to change CP into Wikipedia's more liberal world-view, or have CP adopt Wikipedia's member conventions, a person's efforts then cross over into something more; "Internet Terrorism". CP has an owner, it is his right to have whatever viewpoint he wants. If people agree, with even a part, they stick around and help build this place. If they don't, what other reason, other than being obstinate or having malicious intent, could they have? Disagreement is fine, debate is good. But where does it end, and the ability of like-minded individuals to associate with those they agree with, without argument without end begin?''' | ||
| + | '''So if you find yourself blocked by me, please re-read this. If after doing so you feel you have made positive, non-talk edits and article improvements, email me using the link to the left, or the information at the top of this page. ''Don't expect an answer if I check and find no such positive contributions''.''' | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | + | *'''''Read about "Reconstructing American History" [http://newt.org/Portals/0/Capitol%20Visitor%20Center%20Report_.pdf here.]''''' | |
==[[User:TK/Sandbox|Religion: What Do I Believe?]] == | ==[[User:TK/Sandbox|Religion: What Do I Believe?]] == | ||
Revision as of 12:10, March 13, 2009
3,900 pages watched not counting talk pages.
My Blocking Policy:True wikis have simple, clear rules. Otherwise it is a mobocracy and Conservapedia and its Founder has explicitly rejected mob rule, and has Administrators to decide its policy. A person who stops by merely to ridicule and denigrate others scholarly efforts, without at least trying to make positive contributions to this project, cannot have a "point" other than to disrupt and waste the time of sincere contributors and Administrators. If a person comes to Conservapedia knowing full well it is a conservative/Christian friendly wiki-encyclopedia, and is a liberal, the question is why? If the answer is they support Andy Schlafly's idea of intellectual freedom, of a Conservative & Christian-friendly alternative to the decidedly left-of-center, editor dominated Wikipedia, that's great! All voices should be represented on the Net. But if their intentions are merely to argue and dispute Conservative or Christian points of view, that becomes a form of vandalism, inasmuch as it is a great time waster and distraction for those who genuinely want to contribute, and build this encyclopedia. Those who obsessively create new user names, only to argue against our values, and do not make an effort to substantially contribute, are actually terrorists of the Internet kind. What other reason would they have to stick around, arguing and wasting our time? Any board or wiki has the absolute right of free association. I am not for truncating free speech automatically, but after days or weeks of disputing everything, knowing you are not going to change CP into Wikipedia's more liberal world-view, or have CP adopt Wikipedia's member conventions, a person's efforts then cross over into something more; "Internet Terrorism". CP has an owner, it is his right to have whatever viewpoint he wants. If people agree, with even a part, they stick around and help build this place. If they don't, what other reason, other than being obstinate or having malicious intent, could they have? Disagreement is fine, debate is good. But where does it end, and the ability of like-minded individuals to associate with those they agree with, without argument without end begin? So if you find yourself blocked by me, please re-read this. If after doing so you feel you have made positive, non-talk edits and article improvements, email me using the link to the left, or the information at the top of this page. Don't expect an answer if I check and find no such positive contributions.
Religion: What Do I Believe?
Category Discussion
ContestTK's November Contest Stats
Alexa and board stats
Uploaded files: 27,819 Number of users: 76,235 Sysop count: 31 Current Version: 1.35.14 Page revision number: 638829 Language: en |