Difference between revisions of "Deliberate ignorance"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Once again, I'm editing out unsourced statements, as Aschafly insists be done)
(Undo revision 506429 by Sefsefy (Talk) removals by banned user. material is all supported in linked articles. this one is a compilation)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
* [[Howard Dean]], a physician, former Governor, and longtime politician, refusing to recognize that [[taxpayer-funded abortion]] increases the number of [[abortion]]s<ref>http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?</ref>
 
* [[Howard Dean]], a physician, former Governor, and longtime politician, refusing to recognize that [[taxpayer-funded abortion]] increases the number of [[abortion]]s<ref>http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?</ref>
 +
* refusing to acknowledge the inferior credentials of the critics of [[Richard Sternberg]], whom they ostracize for having published an [[intelligent design]] article
 +
* [[Democrats]] refusing to acknowledge [[Barack Obama]]'s appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters
 +
* [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[migration]] and [[homing]]
 
* [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]]<ref>This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/02/two_tales_of_whale_evolution.php here].</ref>
 
* [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]]<ref>This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/02/two_tales_of_whale_evolution.php here].</ref>
 +
* [[liberals]] refuse to address how [[socialism]] destroys productivity
 +
* [[abortionists]] refuse to address the undisclosed harm to the mothers who have [[abortions]]
 +
* Advocates of the [[global warming theory]] refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity.
 
(add more)
 
(add more)
  
Line 8: Line 14:
  
 
*"I find that hard to believe!" (Howard Dean, June 11, 2008, in response to a fact ignored by [[liberals]]<ref>http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?</ref>)
 
*"I find that hard to believe!" (Howard Dean, June 11, 2008, in response to a fact ignored by [[liberals]]<ref>http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?</ref>)
 +
* "I'm not aware of that!" (without admitting a failure to look)
 +
* "I've never seen that in the [[New York Times]]!"
 +
* "That's not what it said in my ([[public school]]) textbook!"
 +
* "Let's talk about something else!"
 +
* "I'm not interested in that!"
 +
* "They hate us for our freedom!"
 +
* "Complete suspension of disbelief!"
  
 
== Crime of Deliberate Ignorance ==
 
== Crime of Deliberate Ignorance ==

Revision as of 06:57, August 30, 2008

Deliberate ignorance is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions. Examples include:

(add more)

Common expressions of deliberate ignorance include:

  • "I find that hard to believe!" (Howard Dean, June 11, 2008, in response to a fact ignored by liberals[3])
  • "I'm not aware of that!" (without admitting a failure to look)
  • "I've never seen that in the New York Times!"
  • "That's not what it said in my (public school) textbook!"
  • "Let's talk about something else!"
  • "I'm not interested in that!"
  • "They hate us for our freedom!"
  • "Complete suspension of disbelief!"

Crime of Deliberate Ignorance

Deliberate ignorance can be a crime. For example, jurors were instructed "to consider whether ... former Enron Corp. executives deliberately ignored accounting fraud as the energy trader fell into bankruptcy."[4]

References