Difference between revisions of "Template:Science and motivation"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (cat)
(Still annoying.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{stub}}
 
It's not what motivates a scientist's [[argument]] that determines its validity; it's the quality of the [[evidence]] and [[analysis]] that the [[scientist]] uses to support the argument.  [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=349]
 
It's not what motivates a scientist's [[argument]] that determines its validity; it's the quality of the [[evidence]] and [[analysis]] that the [[scientist]] uses to support the argument.  [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=349]
  
 
[[category:Quotes]]
 
[[category:Quotes]]

Revision as of 18:50, August 6, 2008

Template:Stub It's not what motivates a scientist's argument that determines its validity; it's the quality of the evidence and analysis that the scientist uses to support the argument. [1]