Difference between revisions of "Birth control and racism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(start)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
According to a publication by the National Library of Medicine:<ref>Reilly, Philip R. (2015). [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26322647/ Eugenics and Involuntary Sterilization: 1907-2015]. ''National Center for Biotechnology Information''. Retrieved December 12, 2022.</ref>
 
According to a publication by the National Library of Medicine:<ref>Reilly, Philip R. (2015). [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26322647/ Eugenics and Involuntary Sterilization: 1907-2015]. ''National Center for Biotechnology Information''. Retrieved December 12, 2022.</ref>
 
{{cquote|Simplistic eugenic thinking has faded, but coerced sterilization remains widespread, especially in China and India. In many parts of the world, involuntary sterilization is still intermittently used against minority groups.|||Philip R. Reilly, NCBI}}
 
{{cquote|Simplistic eugenic thinking has faded, but coerced sterilization remains widespread, especially in China and India. In many parts of the world, involuntary sterilization is still intermittently used against minority groups.|||Philip R. Reilly, NCBI}}
 +
 +
==U.S. Progressives==
 +
===Eugenics in Oregon, 1920s-40s===
 +
According to Robert R. McCoy in the ''Oregon Historical Quarterly'', Vol. 110, the middle class during the [[Progressive Era]] formed a movement summarized by historians as "radical democratic populism."<ref>McCoy, Robert R. (2009). [https://www.jstor.org/stable/20615986 The Paradox of Oregon's Progressive Politics: The Political Career of Walter Marcus Pierce], p. 392. ''JSTOR''. Retrieved December 12, 2022.</ref> Also deemed "reactionary populism," it was used to describe the tendency for Progressive activists to advocate democratic reforms while simultaneously discriminating against racial and ethnic minorities.
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 16:33, December 12, 2022

Despite extensive whitewashing by contemporary leftists, birth control and racism are heavily linked both in history and the present. In the United States, eugenics, a brainchild of the Progressive Movement, led to a state-enforced implementation of Social Darwinism which became manifested in crimes against humanity justified by leftists as "human betterment." Birth control became a tool for white supremacy viewed as means to persecute nonwhites, and was promoted alongside rampant immigration restriction out of racist fearmongering.

According to a publication by the National Library of Medicine:[1]

“ Simplistic eugenic thinking has faded, but coerced sterilization remains widespread, especially in China and India. In many parts of the world, involuntary sterilization is still intermittently used against minority groups. ”

—Philip R. Reilly, NCBI

U.S. Progressives

Eugenics in Oregon, 1920s-40s

According to Robert R. McCoy in the Oregon Historical Quarterly, Vol. 110, the middle class during the Progressive Era formed a movement summarized by historians as "radical democratic populism."[2] Also deemed "reactionary populism," it was used to describe the tendency for Progressive activists to advocate democratic reforms while simultaneously discriminating against racial and ethnic minorities.

References

  1. ↑ Reilly, Philip R. (2015). Eugenics and Involuntary Sterilization: 1907-2015. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved December 12, 2022.
  2. ↑ McCoy, Robert R. (2009). The Paradox of Oregon's Progressive Politics: The Political Career of Walter Marcus Pierce, p. 392. JSTOR. Retrieved December 12, 2022.