Difference between revisions of "Environmental alarmism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
*Lott, Maxim (May 28, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/science/five-most-over-the-top-climate-warnings Five most over-the-top climate warnings]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved May 28, 2019.
 
*Lott, Maxim (May 28, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/science/five-most-over-the-top-climate-warnings Five most over-the-top climate warnings]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved May 28, 2019.
 
*Dorman, Sam (September 18, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/failed-climate-change-predictions Doomsdays that didn’t happen: Think tank compiles decades’ worth of dire climate predictions]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved September 18, 2019.
 
*Dorman, Sam (September 18, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/failed-climate-change-predictions Doomsdays that didn’t happen: Think tank compiles decades’ worth of dire climate predictions]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved September 18, 2019.
 +
*Tennant, Michael (September 19, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/33459-worried-about-global-warming-consider-these-failed-doomsday-forecasts Worried About Global Warming? Consider These Failed Doomsday Forecasts]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 19, 2019.
 
See also:
 
See also:
 
*Lifson, Thomas (March 8, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/peer-reviewed-study-shows-majority-of-scientists-skeptical-of-global-warming-disaster-predictions Shhhh! Nobody tell Ocasio-Cortez scientists are skeptical of global warming]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved March 20, 2019.</ref> Climate alarmists also advocate for spending massive sums of money for the environment, with one prominent U.S. representative claiming that an effective climate plan would cost at least $10 trillion.<ref>Elis, Niv (June 5, 2019). [https://thehill.com/policy/finance/447077-ocasio-cortez-10-trillion-needed-for-effective-climate-plan Ocasio-Cortez: $10 trillion needed for effective climate plan]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 5, 2019.</ref> By creating fear, climate alarmists are better able to advance their left-wing political agenda.<ref>Murphy, James (June 12, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/32577-climate-change-science-and-politics-it-s-all-about-creating-fear Climate Change Science and Politics: It’s All About Creating Fear]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 12, 2019.</ref>
 
*Lifson, Thomas (March 8, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/peer-reviewed-study-shows-majority-of-scientists-skeptical-of-global-warming-disaster-predictions Shhhh! Nobody tell Ocasio-Cortez scientists are skeptical of global warming]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved March 20, 2019.</ref> Climate alarmists also advocate for spending massive sums of money for the environment, with one prominent U.S. representative claiming that an effective climate plan would cost at least $10 trillion.<ref>Elis, Niv (June 5, 2019). [https://thehill.com/policy/finance/447077-ocasio-cortez-10-trillion-needed-for-effective-climate-plan Ocasio-Cortez: $10 trillion needed for effective climate plan]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 5, 2019.</ref> By creating fear, climate alarmists are better able to advance their left-wing political agenda.<ref>Murphy, James (June 12, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/32577-climate-change-science-and-politics-it-s-all-about-creating-fear Climate Change Science and Politics: It’s All About Creating Fear]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 12, 2019.</ref>

Revision as of 02:43, September 20, 2019

Climate alarmism is a common trait exhibited by liberals, who greatly exaggerate perceived existential threats posed by the gradual changing of Earth's climate. Many predictions of environmental catastrophe because of climate change have been wrong.[1] Climate alarmists also advocate for spending massive sums of money for the environment, with one prominent U.S. representative claiming that an effective climate plan would cost at least $10 trillion.[2] By creating fear, climate alarmists are better able to advance their left-wing political agenda.[3]

Marc Morano of CNSNews.com wrote:

The Daily Telegraph, of London, wrote:

  • In the late 1960s, eco-evangelists such as the best selling author Paul Ehrlich stated: "In the 1970s and 1980s, hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite any crash programs embarked on now ... Before 1985, mankind will enter a stage of scarcity in which accessible supplies of many kinds of minerals will be nearing depletion." [5]

Amy Ridenour wrote:

  • Environmental alarmists, as an article of faith, peddle the notion that climate change is, as Greenpeace put it, "the biggest environmental threat facing...developing countries." For one, such thinking runs contrary to the public declaration of the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development-a program sponsored by the United Nations-which found that poverty is the number one threat facing developing countries.[6]

By 2019, voters were increasingly rejecting radical climate alarmist policies.[7]

External links

References

  1. ↑ Multiple references: See also:
  2. ↑ Elis, Niv (June 5, 2019). Ocasio-Cortez: $10 trillion needed for effective climate plan. The Hill. Retrieved June 5, 2019.
  3. ↑ Murphy, James (June 12, 2019). Climate Change Science and Politics: It’s All About Creating Fear. The New American. Retrieved June 12, 2019.
  4. ↑ http://www.cdfe.org/global_warming_religion.htm
  5. ↑ http://www.cdfe.org/London_telegraph.htm
  6. ↑ http://www.nationalcenter.org/TSR72903.html
  7. ↑ Burnett, H. Sterling (May 18, 2019). Around the world, backlash against expensive climate-change policies. Washington Examiner. Retrieved May 18, 2019.

Template:Climategate Scandal