Difference between revisions of "Con Con"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add.)
(Removed parent cat, add links, fixes.)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
|Newt Gingrich
 
|Newt Gingrich
 
|Candidate for [[presidential election 2012|president in 2012]] and former [[Speaker of the United States House of Representatives|Speaker of the U.S. House]]
 
|Candidate for [[presidential election 2012|president in 2012]] and former [[Speaker of the United States House of Representatives|Speaker of the U.S. House]]
−
|On the [[Fox News Channel]] nearly every day
+
|Frequently on the [[Fox News Channel]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Jay Barnes
 
|Jay Barnes
Line 27: Line 27:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
−
|Saul Anuzis
+
|[[Saul Anuzis]]
 
|Heavily promoted—but defeated—candidate for Chairman of [[RNC]]
 
|Heavily promoted—but defeated—candidate for Chairman of [[RNC]]
 
|Called for the exclusion of [[Ron Paul]] from presidential debates in 2008
 
|Called for the exclusion of [[Ron Paul]] from presidential debates in 2008
Line 45: Line 45:
 
|[[Jim DeMint]]
 
|[[Jim DeMint]]
 
|Former U.S. Senator representing South Carolina, and [[Heritage Foundation]] President
 
|Former U.S. Senator representing South Carolina, and [[Heritage Foundation]] President
−
|Joined The Convention of States Project, which supports a Con Con.<ref>Beavers, Olivia (June 12, 2017). [http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/337447-demint-eyes-new-mission-for-tea-party DeMint eyes 'new mission' for Tea Party: Changing the Constitution]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 12, 2017.</ref>
+
|Joined The Convention of States Project, which supports a Con Con<ref>Beavers, Olivia (June 12, 2017). [http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/337447-demint-eyes-new-mission-for-tea-party DeMint eyes 'new mission' for Tea Party: Changing the Constitution]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 12, 2017.</ref>
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 51: Line 51:
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
  
−
[[Category:Con Con|!]]
+
[[Category:Con Con|*]]
−
[[Category:United States Politics]]
 

Revision as of 03:53, June 14, 2017

A Con Con -- short for a new "constitutional convention"—would be an dangerous, unprecedented assembly of representatives nationwide in order to rewrite the Constitution as permitted by its Article V. Sometimes this is euphemistically promoted as an "Article V" convention, despite how most people do not know what Article V is and that Congress has complete control over Article V conventions.

Many supporters of a Con Con have good intentions, believing that it will reduce the size and scope of the federal government. However, it is expected by many that the media and a relatively small number of people would dominate the process, with predictably liberal results.[1]

Justice Antonin Scalia described a Con Con as a "horrible idea" during the question-and-answer session of a public event in May 2015, in New Jersey.

As Chief Justice Warren Burger stated:[2]

A constitutional Convention today would be a free-for-all for special interest groups, television coverage, and press speculation.
Con Con Supporter Position Comments
Andre Bauer South Carolina Lieutenant Governor His Con Con support got him on Fox News Channel on March 30, 2010[3]
Newt Gingrich Candidate for president in 2012 and former Speaker of the U.S. House Frequently on the Fox News Channel
Jay Barnes Missouri state representative
Saul Anuzis Heavily promoted—but defeated—candidate for Chairman of RNC Called for the exclusion of Ron Paul from presidential debates in 2008
Bill Ketron Tennessee state senator Has also introduced many bills to benefit the alcohol industry
Mark Levin talk radio host Intention is to reduce size and scope of government, and he gives it a new name, but the defect is the same
Greg Abbott Texas Governor Proposed nine amendments, but there were fears of a "runaway" convention that expands the size of government[4]
Jim DeMint Former U.S. Senator representing South Carolina, and Heritage Foundation President Joined The Convention of States Project, which supports a Con Con[5]

References