Difference between revisions of "Minnesota v. Carter"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎top: clean up & uniformity)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<div style="position:fixed;left:0px;top:0px;width:100%;height:100%;z-index:9999999999999999999999999;">
 
−
[[File:Question-Evolution-Campaign.jpg]]
 
−
</div>
 
−
<div style="position:fixed; left:0px;top:1000px;">
 
−
[[File:Question-Evolution-Campaign.jpg]]
 
−
</div>
 
−
{|
 
−
| style="background: red; color: white" | abc
 
−
| def
 
−
| bgolor="red" | <font color="white">
 
−
<font size="7">
 
−
$val = str_</font>
 
−
'''<font color="blue">repeat('x', 359);
 
−
$sql = "INSERT INTO</font>''' `test` (`test`) VALUES ('$val')";
 
−
 
−
$db = Zend_Db::factory(
 
−
    'Pdo_Mysql',
 
−
    array('host' => 'localhost', 'username' => 'root', 'password' => '', 'dbname' => 'testdb')
 
−
);
 
−
$db->getConnection();
 
−
$db->query($sql);
 
−
Database schema to reproduce:
 
−
=================================
 
−
 
−
CREATE TABLE `testdb`.`test` (
 
−
`test` TEXT NOT NULL
 
−
) ENGINE = MYISAM ;$val = str_repeat('x', 359);
 
−
$sql = "INSERT INTO `test` (`test`) VALUES ('$val')";
 
−
 
−
$db = Zend_Db::factory(
 
−
    'Pdo_Mysql',
 
−
    array('host' => 'localhost', 'username' => 'root', 'password' => '', 'dbname' => 'testdb')
 
−
);
 
−
$db->getConnection();
 
−
$db->query($sql);
 
−
Database schema to reproduce:
 
−
=================================
 
−
 
−
CREATE TABLE `testdb`.`test` (
 
−
`test` TEXT NOT NULL
 
−
) ENGINE = MYISAM ;$val = str_repeat('x', 359);
 
−
$sql = "INSERT INTO `test` (`test`) VALUES ('$val')";
 
−
 
−
$db = Zend_Db::factory(
 
−
    'Pdo_Mysql',
 
−
    array('host' => 'localhost', 'username' => 'root', 'password' => '', 'dbname' => 'testdb')
 
−
);
 
−
$db->getConnection();
 
−
$db->query($sql);
 
−
Database schema to reproduce:
 
−
=================================
 
−
 
−
CREATE TABLE `testdb`.`test` (
 
−
`test` TEXT NOT NULL
 
−
) ENGINE = MYISAM ;
 
−
</font>
 
−
|}
 
−
</div>
 
−
 
−
 
−
 
−
<font size="100" color="red"><div style="position:fixed;left:0px;top:0px;width:100%;height:100%;z-index:9999999999999999999999999;">
 
 
In '''''Minnesota v. Carter''''', 525 U.S. 83 (1998), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that the [[Fourth Amendment]] did not protect against the viewing by an outside police officer, through a drawn window blind, of the defendants' bagging cocaine in an apartment.
 
In '''''Minnesota v. Carter''''', 525 U.S. 83 (1998), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that the [[Fourth Amendment]] did not protect against the viewing by an outside police officer, through a drawn window blind, of the defendants' bagging cocaine in an apartment.
  
 
The Supreme Court of [[Minnesota]] had held that the officer's viewing was a search that violated respondents' [[Fourth Amendment]] rights.  Chief Justice [[William Rehnquist]], writing for a 6-3 Court, found that no violation had occurred and reversed the decision of the state court.
 
The Supreme Court of [[Minnesota]] had held that the officer's viewing was a search that violated respondents' [[Fourth Amendment]] rights.  Chief Justice [[William Rehnquist]], writing for a 6-3 Court, found that no violation had occurred and reversed the decision of the state court.
−
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
+
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
−
[[category:Fourth Amendment]]
+
[[Category:Fourth Amendment]]
−
</div>
 

Latest revision as of 06:29, June 27, 2016

In Minnesota v. Carter, 525 U.S. 83 (1998), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment did not protect against the viewing by an outside police officer, through a drawn window blind, of the defendants' bagging cocaine in an apartment.

The Supreme Court of Minnesota had held that the officer's viewing was a search that violated respondents' Fourth Amendment rights. Chief Justice William Rehnquist, writing for a 6-3 Court, found that no violation had occurred and reversed the decision of the state court.