Difference between revisions of "Talk:Artificial intelligence"
CatWatcher (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (19 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
This article is in dire need of some basic information about different types of AI, and some critical analysis, such as Searle's Chinese Room argument. --[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 17:22, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | This article is in dire need of some basic information about different types of AI, and some critical analysis, such as Searle's Chinese Room argument. --[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 17:22, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've added a few paragraphs, and a reference to the Seale paper. Hopefully it's okay, I'm rather new to this whole wiki-editing business. In fact, this is the first wiki I've ever edited, so please forgive any mistakes of style. But can the 'needs serious improvements' tag be removed now? [[User:JohnEasterman|JohnEasterman]] 12:01, 18 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Enoch AI== | ||
| + | See what [https://www.brighteon.com/1cb03079-f9b3-4417-81f6-be58a3bf482d Enoch AI] says about the Russian economy versus all the [[neocon]] [[liberal claptrap]] [[User:Conservative]] has [[spammed]] into [[Conservapedia]] from ShatGPT. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If the [[CP]] database had not been so polluted with [[User:Conservative]]'s [[liberal claptrap]] in the field of [[foreign policy]], Mike Adams might have (or probably still could) populate his AI with Consertvapedia instead of [[Wikipedia]], which User: Conservative loves to use. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 20:36, August 22, 2025 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Question== | ||
| + | While Andy set the tone for this article with "''While AI has benefits, AI is being used for liberal indoctrination, and to promote harmful vices like gambling,''" is Andy going to allow [[User:Conservative]] to take over the subject and fill up Categories and the Search Engine with [[spam]] essays promoting the [[positive]] benefits of [[AI]], like AI does not have high rates of alcoholism, AIDS, divorce, church attendance, [[flush toilet]]s or [[gay bathhouse]]s? It would be helpful to know before wasting anymore years attempting to edit [[Conservapedia]] without being [[shadow banned]] internally. Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 23:19, August 24, 2025 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-depopulation-agenda-how-vaccines?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=581065&post_id=179072329&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=5cnyg&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email DEPOPULATION AGENDA: How Vaccines, AI and Globalist Elites Are Targeting Humanity]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==How AI reduces your cognitively (sic) abilities such as critical thinking and your learning ability if you use it wrongly == | ||
| + | Too late. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 10:46, October 19, 2025 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It doesn't make sense to use [[AI]] for the body of text to write this article. It should all be stripped out. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Abnormal is fine. Stupid isn't.]]</sup> 04:08, February 5, 2026 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:08, February 5, 2026
Many religious leaders have likened the progress in artificial intelligence as a contrived effort by secular liberal organizations to subvert the divinity of God, essentially attempting to cut God out of the loop and take his place as the creator of all life.
There are no references for this statement.--Sm355 11:36, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
- Apologies. I am in the process of trying to find the article I read. It was some time ago and I don't exactly recall where I read it. If I don't find it today, I'll remove this statement. --BillOReillyFan 11:49, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
Still no references
Sounds more like BillOReillyFan's personal opinion.
- You're right. Until the reference is found the content is best left absent. --BillOReillyFan 17:57, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
This article is in dire need of some basic information about different types of AI, and some critical analysis, such as Searle's Chinese Room argument. --CatWatcher 17:22, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
I've added a few paragraphs, and a reference to the Seale paper. Hopefully it's okay, I'm rather new to this whole wiki-editing business. In fact, this is the first wiki I've ever edited, so please forgive any mistakes of style. But can the 'needs serious improvements' tag be removed now? JohnEasterman 12:01, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
Enoch AI
See what Enoch AI says about the Russian economy versus all the neocon liberal claptrap User:Conservative has spammed into Conservapedia from ShatGPT.
If the CP database had not been so polluted with User:Conservative's liberal claptrap in the field of foreign policy, Mike Adams might have (or probably still could) populate his AI with Consertvapedia instead of Wikipedia, which User: Conservative loves to use. RobSZelensky Must Go! 20:36, August 22, 2025 (EDT)
Question
While Andy set the tone for this article with "While AI has benefits, AI is being used for liberal indoctrination, and to promote harmful vices like gambling," is Andy going to allow User:Conservative to take over the subject and fill up Categories and the Search Engine with spam essays promoting the positive benefits of AI, like AI does not have high rates of alcoholism, AIDS, divorce, church attendance, flush toilets or gay bathhouses? It would be helpful to know before wasting anymore years attempting to edit Conservapedia without being shadow banned internally. Thanks. RobSZelensky Must Go! 23:19, August 24, 2025 (EDT)
How AI reduces your cognitively (sic) abilities such as critical thinking and your learning ability if you use it wrongly
Too late. RobSZelensky Must Go! 10:46, October 19, 2025 (EDT)
It doesn't make sense to use AI for the body of text to write this article. It should all be stripped out. RobSAbnormal is fine. Stupid isn't. 04:08, February 5, 2026 (EST)