Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Conservapedia"
Favre4Pope (talk | contribs) (New page: I'm confused - where's the evidence of a rampant wave of homosexual-centric deceit? --~~~~) |
m (Reverted edits by SimonGordon (Talk); changed back to last version by GeorgeShrub) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm confused - where's the evidence of a rampant wave of homosexual-centric deceit? --[[User:Favre4Pope|Favre4Pope]] 17:56, 21 November 2007 (EST) | I'm confused - where's the evidence of a rampant wave of homosexual-centric deceit? --[[User:Favre4Pope|Favre4Pope]] 17:56, 21 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | This article states that we've listed the 25 worst Supreme Court decisions, and the role deceit played in them. I just checked out that article, and I'm not really sure the role of deceit was mentioned in them. --[[User:Favre4Pope|Favre4Pope]] 18:02, 21 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Read more carefully. Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:33, 21 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Does anyone know of any external links that have something nice to say about all our wonderful achievements over the last year? Are there any? I've googled and I've googled but all I can find is obnoxious liberal mockery. [[User:GeorgeShrub|GeorgeShrub]] 11:23, 22 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : It's lonely at the top, George. Those who seek approval by [[liberals]] are better off getting jobs that dole out government benefits. Regardless, happy Thanksgiving.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:28, 22 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Exactly. I was hoping to find endorsements from fellow conservatives and their links recommending our educational, clean, and concise entries to their friends, families and acquaintances. It would give us a nice warm glow inside to see the conservative community supporting us. [[User:GeorgeShrub|GeorgeShrub]] 11:49, 22 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::: There have been lots of favorable articles in the general press, and [[MSNBC]] featured us one day also. Other conservative groups have used our materials. It takes time to be fully accepted. Recall the saying about a prophet and his home town?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:56, 22 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::: Combating “internet crime.” Is this a reference to the FBI incident?--[[User:McIntyre|McIntyre]] 14:43, 22 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is anyone in a position to provide links to the favorable articles about us in the general press? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is anyone in a position to provide links to the conservative groups have used our materials? | ||
| + | |||
| + | I fully agree that it takes time to be fully accepted. A first anniversary seems a good time to take stock. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Are there any links to us on the internet recommending us as an educational, clean, and concise encyclopedia? | ||
| + | |||
| + | If there are, is anyone in a position to provide links to those links? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:GeorgeShrub|GeorgeShrub]] 18:26, 22 November 2007 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:27, November 25, 2007
I'm confused - where's the evidence of a rampant wave of homosexual-centric deceit? --Favre4Pope 17:56, 21 November 2007 (EST)
This article states that we've listed the 25 worst Supreme Court decisions, and the role deceit played in them. I just checked out that article, and I'm not really sure the role of deceit was mentioned in them. --Favre4Pope 18:02, 21 November 2007 (EST)
- Read more carefully. Thanks and Godspeed.--Aschlafly 18:33, 21 November 2007 (EST)
Does anyone know of any external links that have something nice to say about all our wonderful achievements over the last year? Are there any? I've googled and I've googled but all I can find is obnoxious liberal mockery. GeorgeShrub 11:23, 22 November 2007 (EST)
- It's lonely at the top, George. Those who seek approval by liberals are better off getting jobs that dole out government benefits. Regardless, happy Thanksgiving.--Aschlafly 11:28, 22 November 2007 (EST)
- Exactly. I was hoping to find endorsements from fellow conservatives and their links recommending our educational, clean, and concise entries to their friends, families and acquaintances. It would give us a nice warm glow inside to see the conservative community supporting us. GeorgeShrub 11:49, 22 November 2007 (EST)
- Combating “internet crime.” Is this a reference to the FBI incident?--McIntyre 14:43, 22 November 2007 (EST)
Is anyone in a position to provide links to the favorable articles about us in the general press?
Is anyone in a position to provide links to the conservative groups have used our materials?
I fully agree that it takes time to be fully accepted. A first anniversary seems a good time to take stock.
Are there any links to us on the internet recommending us as an educational, clean, and concise encyclopedia?
If there are, is anyone in a position to provide links to those links?
GeorgeShrub 18:26, 22 November 2007 (EST)