Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Evidence of Evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Feebasfactor (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
It is adaptation. It would be considered "microevolution". Species change over time but they don't change into anything new. I've never seen a monkey give birth to a human or a frog give birth to a lizard. --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 22:17, 26 October 2007 (EDT) | It is adaptation. It would be considered "microevolution". Species change over time but they don't change into anything new. I've never seen a monkey give birth to a human or a frog give birth to a lizard. --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 22:17, 26 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
*Such an event would actually disprove evolution, KonservativeKanadian. Same thing goes for any species directly giving birth to an entirely different one. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> 11:28, 27 October 2007 (EDT) | *Such an event would actually disprove evolution, KonservativeKanadian. Same thing goes for any species directly giving birth to an entirely different one. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> 11:28, 27 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :''Species change over time but they don't change into anything new.'' I don't quite get it. If anything changes, isn't it now, by definition, "something new"? Or are you using a different interpretation of the term? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 13:23, 27 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:23, October 27, 2007
Antibiotic Resistance is not Evolution
It is adaptation. It would be considered "microevolution". Species change over time but they don't change into anything new. I've never seen a monkey give birth to a human or a frog give birth to a lizard. --Konservativekanadian 22:17, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
- Such an event would actually disprove evolution, KonservativeKanadian. Same thing goes for any species directly giving birth to an entirely different one. --transResident Transfanform! 11:28, 27 October 2007 (EDT)
- Species change over time but they don't change into anything new. I don't quite get it. If anything changes, isn't it now, by definition, "something new"? Or are you using a different interpretation of the term? Feebasfactor 13:23, 27 October 2007 (EDT)