Difference between revisions of "Template:Science and motivation"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Still annoying.)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{stub}}
+
 
 
It's not what motivates a scientist's [[argument]] that determines its validity; it's the quality of the [[evidence]] and [[analysis]] that the [[scientist]] uses to support the argument.  [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=349]
 
It's not what motivates a scientist's [[argument]] that determines its validity; it's the quality of the [[evidence]] and [[analysis]] that the [[scientist]] uses to support the argument.  [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=349]
  
 
[[category:Quotes]]
 
[[category:Quotes]]

Revision as of 20:36, December 13, 2009

It's not what motivates a scientist's argument that determines its validity; it's the quality of the evidence and analysis that the scientist uses to support the argument. [1]