Difference between revisions of "Deinonychus"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎top: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://en.wikipedia.org → https://en.wikipedia.org)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[Image:deinonychus.jpg|thumb|right|300px|A fossilized ''Deinonychus antirrhopus'' skeleton. Like many museum skeletons, this might be replica of the original set of fossils.]]
+
{{Taxonomy
 +
|name=Deinonychus (extinct)
 +
|image=deinonychus.jpg
 +
|caption=
 +
|superkingdom=
 +
|kingdom= Animalia
 +
|subkingdom=
 +
|superphylum=
 +
|phylum=Chordata
 +
|subphylum=
 +
|infraphylum=
 +
|microphylum=
 +
|superdivision=
 +
|division=
 +
|subdivision=
 +
|superclass=
 +
|class=Sauropsida
 +
|subclass=Diapsida
 +
|infraclass=Archosauromorpha
 +
|superorder=Dinosauria
 +
|order=Saurischia
 +
|suborder=Theropoda
 +
|infraorder=
 +
|superfamily=
 +
|family=Dromaeosauridae
 +
|subfamily=
 +
|supertribe=
 +
|tribe=
 +
|subtribe=
 +
|genera=
 +
|genus=Deinonychus
 +
|subgenus=
 +
|species=D. antirrhopus
 +
|binomialname=
 +
|sub=
 +
|alt=
 +
}}
 +
'''Deinonychus''' was a small, [[bipedal]], [[carnivore|carnivorous]] [[dinosaur]]. It is generally believed among [[evolutionist]]s to have existed about 65-70 million years ago during the [[Cretaceous]] period, but [[young earth creationist]]s accept it as having been created on the [[sixth day]], along with all the other dinosaurs. It had a long, [[sickle]]-like [[claw]] on the end of its big toe. ''Deinonychus'' [[fossils]] were first discovered in 1931 by [[Barnum Brown]] in southern [[Montana]]. In 1964 the fossils were designated ''Deinonychus antirrhopus'' by [[John Ostrom]] and [[Grant Meyer]].
  
−
'''Deinonychus''' was a small, bipedal, [[Cretaceous|Cretaceous-era]] carnivorous dinosaur. It had a long, sickle-like claw on the end of its big toe. ''Deinonychus'' [[fossils]] were first discovered in 1931 by Barnum Brown in southern [[Montana]]. In 1964 the fossils were designated ''Deinonychus antirrhopus'' by John Ostrom and Grant Meyer.  
+
Deinonychus are believed by many evolutionists to have been [[feather]]ed, citing other supposedly feathered dinosaurs such as [[microraptor]].<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deinonychus</ref> However, whether or not even the related specimens were feathered is questionable. In fact, the only fossils that allegedly show these feathers are from [[China]], and because of the infamous [[archaeoraptor]] fraud, it is very possible that these other fossils are also forgeries.<ref>[http://www.creationwiki.org/Feathered_dinosaur]</ref>
−
+
 
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Evolution]]
 
[[Category:Dinosaurs]]
 
[[Category:Dinosaurs]]

Latest revision as of 15:15, September 26, 2018

Deinonychus (extinct)
Deinonychus.jpg
Scientific classification
Kingdom Information
Kingdom Animalia
Phylum Information
Phylum Chordata
Class Information
Class Sauropsida
Sub-class Diapsida
Infra-class Archosauromorpha
Order Information
Superorder Dinosauria
Order Saurischia
Sub-order Theropoda
Family Information
Family Dromaeosauridae
Genus Information
Genus Deinonychus
Species Information
Species D. antirrhopus
Population statistics

Deinonychus was a small, bipedal, carnivorous dinosaur. It is generally believed among evolutionists to have existed about 65-70 million years ago during the Cretaceous period, but young earth creationists accept it as having been created on the sixth day, along with all the other dinosaurs. It had a long, sickle-like claw on the end of its big toe. Deinonychus fossils were first discovered in 1931 by Barnum Brown in southern Montana. In 1964 the fossils were designated Deinonychus antirrhopus by John Ostrom and Grant Meyer.

Deinonychus are believed by many evolutionists to have been feathered, citing other supposedly feathered dinosaurs such as microraptor.[1] However, whether or not even the related specimens were feathered is questionable. In fact, the only fossils that allegedly show these feathers are from China, and because of the infamous archaeoraptor fraud, it is very possible that these other fossils are also forgeries.[2]

References