Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:AFD MaDonal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply) |
(re) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think this article should be deleted. The topic is obscure, and this article reads like a sort of speculative essay or something. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 17:01, 18 May 2017 (EDT) | I think this article should be deleted. The topic is obscure, and this article reads like a sort of speculative essay or something. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 17:01, 18 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
| − | It is certainly unheard of, and the information is better placed on the McDonalds page. Then again, this isn't the print Britannica, where we put as much information in as few articles as possible, and we have lots of articles on obscure topics or terms that are only a few sentences long.--Nathan--[[User:Abcqwe|Abcqwe]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 17:08, 18 May 2017 (EDT) | + | |
| + | :It is certainly unheard of, and the information is better placed on the McDonalds page. Then again, this isn't the print Britannica, where we put as much information in as few articles as possible, and we have lots of articles on obscure topics or terms that are only a few sentences long.--Nathan--[[User:Abcqwe|Abcqwe]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 17:08, 18 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::It is very obscure, but as Nathan said, we have many obscure articles. I don't see that this is doing any harm, so i probably would let it be. We at least least put a disambiguation link to McDonald's at the top, but the intro does quickly explain the difference. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 18:36, 18 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:36, May 18, 2017
I think this article should be deleted. The topic is obscure, and this article reads like a sort of speculative essay or something. --Anglican (talk) 17:01, 18 May 2017 (EDT)
- It is certainly unheard of, and the information is better placed on the McDonalds page. Then again, this isn't the print Britannica, where we put as much information in as few articles as possible, and we have lots of articles on obscure topics or terms that are only a few sentences long.--Nathan--Abcqwe (talk) 17:08, 18 May 2017 (EDT)
- It is very obscure, but as Nathan said, we have many obscure articles. I don't see that this is doing any harm, so i probably would let it be. We at least least put a disambiguation link to McDonald's at the top, but the intro does quickly explain the difference. --David B (TALK) 18:36, 18 May 2017 (EDT)