Difference between revisions of "Talk:Galah"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Note about 1990sguy's edit.) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:I'll let User:1990'sguy's edit go by because, in a humourless, impolite, pointless and unnecessary and strictly technical way, he is right. I do, however, think he's a bit of a galah for doing it. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] ([[User talk:AlanE|talk]]) 22:22, 23 September 2016 (EDT) | :I'll let User:1990'sguy's edit go by because, in a humourless, impolite, pointless and unnecessary and strictly technical way, he is right. I do, however, think he's a bit of a galah for doing it. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] ([[User talk:AlanE|talk]]) 22:22, 23 September 2016 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Well, thanks for the kind, heartwarming words, AlanE (sarcasm). My edit really makes it look more encyclopedic. Do you disagree? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:30, 24 September 2016 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:30, September 25, 2016
No one, but no one, refers to the "galah cockatoo". It's a galah. Just galah. Unless there's an Australian adjective in front of it - though the adjective usually refers to galahs en masse, because there are parts of the country where flocks can be enormous and quite devestating. In the Australian vernacular, a galah is also a stupid person.
- Just saying... AlanE 16:43, 23 October 2012 (EDT)
- I agree, but we'll keep it this way, just to separate the bird from the bird-brain. Karajou 16:55, 23 October 2012 (EDT)
OK? AlanE 23:04, 23 October 2012 (EDT)
- Very much ok. I only did some minor adjustments. One of them is your reference to Pizzy's book. Can you provide a page number from the book so it could be added into the references? Karajou 00:00, 24 October 2012 (EDT)
- Have done. It's Pizzey by the way, and his references are terrible. And thanks for the leg-up! AlanE 01:30, 24 October 2012 (EDT)