I agree with you. The grammar of many articles, and the use of categories, are poor reflections of high ideals.Canuck 08:51, 8 November 2008 (EST)
- Be sure to have a look at Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style, too Canuck 08:59, 8 November 2008 (EST)
- That's why I'm here as well. Grammar and spelling are despicable. I don't pay so much attention to the ideology, just that it comes across more intelligible. WesleySHello! 21:30, 12 November 2008 (EST)
- Good! I'm also trying to add more to the articles that aren't constantly debated. If you look on some pages like Barack Obama you'll see that it's HUGE, but then you go to the Tiger article and it's near empty..-- St0dad 21:34, 12 November 2008 (EST)
- That's why I'm here as well. Grammar and spelling are despicable. I don't pay so much attention to the ideology, just that it comes across more intelligible. WesleySHello! 21:30, 12 November 2008 (EST)