User talk:SimeonC

• actually try Wikipedia - you can change it if you disagree but be prepared to argue your case with facts, references and citations rather than "because I say so - sorry page is locked now". The rules are there to be examined and a process exists for appealing if you still disagree with what they say, you will also find that they are more objective than you are and respect other peoples opinions more than you do.

Oh really? Ok, Prof. Carroll Quigley (you know, the guy who got Pres. Bill Clinton his Rhodes Scholarship, and Clinton paid homage to in his 1992 Acceptance Speech...Remember?) says of IPR, "Many of these experts...in the Institute of Pacific Relations were captured by Communist ideology....they propagandized, as experts, erroneous ideas and sought to influence policy in mistaken directions. ...the whole subject is of major importance in understanding the twentieth century."

If WP is so unbiased and fair, and has a process for appealing any your claims, why did they ban me for two years, and delete the entries I created on Frederick Field, T.A. Bisson, and Andrew Roth? WP:IPR The Andrew Roth entry in particular was deleted in December 2005, recreated in July 2007, redeleted [1] and recreated again without the significant biographical material. T.A. Bisson was deleted 3 weeks ago, the editors note says "still alive, otherwise A7. Non notable person, no significant coverage." [2]

Non-notable? My sources, i.e. the United States Government, says he was instrumental in bringing the CCP to power (in otherwords, bring about the enslavement of about 1/4 of the human race on planet earth). See McCarthyism#Amerasia cover up, and my source, McCarthyism#_note-3.

The whole subject is of major importance in understanding the 20th century.... they are more objective than you are and respect other peoples opinions...a process exists for appealing if you still disagree with what they say...Amerasia cover up....McCarthyism....

Comeback when and if you are ever able to engage in substantive facts or discussion. Rob Smith 18:34, 10 September 2007 (EDT)