User talk:Radh

Hi, and welcome to our collaborative editing project.

Could you do this edit again, and find a way to keep the accusation? While you were correct to take out the "never brought to justice" part, because that implies that the accusation is true, it might be useful to our readers to know who accused the agent of murder. We don't need to take sides in controversies all the time; often it's better to present both sides and let the reader decide, as in the original Wikipedia NPOV policy. --Ed Poor ^Talk 12:25, 20 March 2010 (EDT)

Wow. Pretty inflammatory edit. Almost a textbook definition of what is commonly refered to as "commie agitprop." The woman's hands were severed by a local coronor/pathologist and sent to the FBI for fingerprinting and identification, it appears. Rob Smith 15:02, 20 March 2010 (EDT)

This issue is spreading to three talk pages, sorry about that. But if a coroner severed the hands only to get ID and not to intimidate, that's one POV. I'd like to find out if that is a normal practice, and how that differs legally from mutilation (generally considered a crime). Can you and Radh work together on this? --Ed Poor ^Talk 15:11, 20 March 2010 (EDT)

It is a bit strange, that the corpse could not be identified, if, as is said, some of the FBI agents present knew her - she also had been in custody recently. But intimidation has not been mentioned on the webpages I have seen (perhaps a third). 2.) The fact that the first coroner did not notice the damage from the bullet to the neck/back of head seems nearly unbelievable, but similar things happen even in my "Prussian" country. 3.) Strangely, this suspected "cover-up" did not work, because of the second autopsy, which Aquash's daughters got with the help of AIM (it is said). So AIM activity led to their implication (that AIM members did it is now common sense, even on AIM members' sites) in this.--Radh 07:47, 22 March 2010 (EDT)