User talk:Phillipps
Atheism Article
Please do not recreate articles at atheism but rather use the talk pages. Conservative 18:26, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
Sorry, I thought that it would be better to see it.--Phillipps 18:28, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
New Criticisms of Atheism Article.
- Please note that everything below is both a work in progress and not an actual Conservapedia article. It is designed to be the complimentary article for my alternative article on atheism. Please don't edit or vandalize this, it is a personal project. I would like to thank all those that contributed to the original article: much of the wording below is that of others. (I'll get started on this later).
re: Copying the conservapedia atheism article at this website
Dear Phillipps,
Please do not copy the conservapedia atheism article elsewhere on this website. Thank you. I erased your copying and will block you if you continue to persist. Thank you. Conservative 22:28, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
- There's nothing wrong with him working on a draft of a new article (other than the possibility that he'll be wasting his time). That's precisely what's being done with the Intelligent Design article.
- Phillipps, please hang fire for a little while while I continue to sort things out. I moved your draft to the wrong place and am having trouble fixing it.
- Philip J. Rayment 22:33, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
- Conservative said that he would send me an e-mail about this, so I'll wait a little bit for that. Philip J. Rayment 22:38, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
- Right. I have plenty of time. Thanks again.--Phillipps 22:39, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
- Conservative said that he would send me an e-mail about this, so I'll wait a little bit for that. Philip J. Rayment 22:38, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
- I am going to log off now, Philip, and I won't be responding until probably tomorrow afternoon. By the way, while I do not agree with many of your views, you seem to be one of the most reasonable people here, and you never resort to bashing other people or name-calling of any kind (something that Conservapedia needs a lot less of, on all sides).--Phillipps 23:23, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
Your atheism article work area has been restored
After doing some research regarding a matter and conferring with PJR I restored your atheism article workspace area. Your workspace article was not deleted due to "bullying". I apologize for any inconvenience you suffered as a result of the workspace article temporarily being deleted.
Here is the workspace file that has been restored:
I did remove the category tags from the workspace area as the owner of the website has said in the past he wants only one official article for a given topic. In other words, we do not have a "Richard Nixon" article and also have a "The Real Richard Nixon" article.
Conservative 10:22, 30 March 2008 (EDT)
- I had moved it to the wrong place (I put the slash the wrong way, which meant it didn't count as a sub-page of yours), but I've now moved it to the correct place.
- I've also restored and relocated the original version you did.
- The two versions are at:
- If you had anything different in the version that was on this talk page, it will still be in the history of this page. I expect that you'll combine the two (three?) versions into one, then want the other one deleted. Let me or another sysop know when you want the redundant one deleted.
- Philip J. Rayment 10:38, 30 March 2008 (EDT)