User talk:DaiseyCutter/NCSE on Wikipedia
Dr. Eugenie Scott, the head of the National Center for Science education (an organization that propagandizes for neo-darwinism)edits at Wikipedia, under the IP User talk:66.47.51.78, an IP registered to ncseweb.org, and has even edited artciles on Dr. Eugenie Scott.
One Wikipedian who contributes (and guards) evolution related articles at Wikipedia knows that Dr. Scott frequents and contributes to wikipedia, as can be seen by this January 16, 2007 edit.
As recently as August 9, 2007, Dr. Scott, or somebody from the NSCE, has edited an article on Dr. Scott, as can be seen with this diff.
Possible NCSE Admission by WP account Glenn Branch
On August 17, 2007, an account name "Glenn Branch" stated:[1]
| “ | On August 9, 2007, the article was anonymously edited from NCSE's dotted quad. Although the edit was minor and factual, updating the lists of NCSE's staff and supporters, it might conceivably be regarded as a violation of Wikipedia policies, such as WP:AUTO. Hence NCSE staff members have been instructed not to edit any Wikipedia entries anonymously, and to familiarize themselves with and observe all applicable policies while editing Wikipedia. Glenn Branch 21:40, 17 August 2007 (UTC) | ” |
It should be noted that by creating accounts and logging in, identifying the source, bias, and agenda of NCSE guardians of evolution related articles on wikipedia becomes virtually impossible.
Confirmation
0603 18-aug-2007: With this edit, Wikipedia deems that it is likely a COI existed.
Onetime Information Project Manager Wesley R. Elsberry
With this edit, a long time wikipedian who guards evolution related articles feigns surprise that Wesley R. Elsberry, former NCSE "Information Project Manager", is contributing at wikipedia.
With this this edit, Wesley R. Elsberry (Onetime NCSE Information Project Manager) attempts to characterize an intelligent design paper in a peer reviewed scientific journal as "substantially similar to previously published articles" (this is part of the Sternberg-Smithsonian controversy, in which the Smithsonian relatiated against Richard Sternberg for his role in the publication of an intelligent design paper in a peer reviewed scientific journal.)