Template talk:Controversial

</div>

• Could somebody add one at the end of the template? Without it, the template messes up the entire page. -CSGuy 20:31, 16 November 2008 (EST)

Fixed. Philip J. Rayment 20:48, 19 November 2008 (EST)

Category:Conservapedia Administration

I think the last line should be changed from

• [[Category:Conservapedia Administration]]

to

• <noinclude>[[Category:Conservapedia Administration]]</noinclude>

because otherwise, all pages this template is used on will be included in that category. This is the case for Talk:Church of Satan and Talk:Homosexuality and Genetics at the moment. --Sid 3050 18:47, 17 July 2011 (EDT)

Yes, I think these were discussion pages a previous administrator wanted to keep an eye on rather than outright delete. We just haven't found a better category for them yet. Rob Smith 18:50, 17 July 2011 (EDT)

Actually, we have. This template also adds articles to Category:Controversial articles, so that angle is covered. The template (and ONLY the template) is apparently supposed to go into the "CP Administration" category, so it should be "noinclude". --Sid 3050 18:55, 17 July 2011 (EDT)

Done. That Category is a mess; there are two large Categories, Template and Templates, that need to be merged, I think. Rob Smith 19:19, 17 July 2011 (EDT)

Hate to rain onto your parade, but now this template is also in the Controversial category. It will be fine if you just replace the line you just edited with "<noinclude>[[Category:Conservapedia Administration]]</noinclude>", trust me. That will cause this template to land in Administration and the articles in Controversial. Or just unlock the template for a few minutes.

Then we can muse whether to stuff from Administration to some other category. And yes, categorization seems to be a mess (though I didn't look deeper into it so far). --Sid 3050 19:28, 17 July 2011 (EDT)