Talk:Zanna Don't

Reversion

I've reverted back to the article, and not just because the replacement template doesn't exist, but because it's not a candidate for speedy deletion.

Speedy deletion should be used for vandalism and other cases where the reason for deletion would not be disputed. That is not the case here. That's not to say that this article should stay, but the need for its deletion should be discussed, not assumed. (Actually, I'd support it's deletion; I don't think it's appropriate here.)

And I'll be unblocking the author; this does not warrant a block, especially a five-year one.

Philip J. Rayment 05:42, 13 November 2008 (EST)