Talk:The Lost Tomb of Jesus

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Because someone attempts to make a negative connection to Christianity with a schlockumentary does not mean that we need to include it in Christianity or Jesus. That should be apparent. It is properly categorized as a movie. Learn together 12:54, 8 January 2008 (EST)

It is, however, better than Category:Religion, which is less specific, and just as insulting. TheEvilSpartan 13:16, 8 January 2008 (EST)
If you believe the classification of religion was incorrect, then two wrongs don't make a right. You will note that no one tried to force back religion after it was changed. The person who applied the category was a workhorse for this site who attached thousands of categories to articles that had none. He did not expect his categorizations to be set in stone. If you see areas where you feel improvement can be made, then apply it. Chances are most of your alterations will be accepted and they will be appreciated, but any efforts to force this upon a Christianity or Jesus category will not be seen favorably. Learn together 13:33, 8 January 2008 (EST)
Right. I too am trying to better the encyclopedia, and, as I explained in the edit summary, I believe that this is a valid category. I am not understanding why you need to be hostile about something when we can simply have a regular conversation about it. If it's about Jesus, then it should be categorized as such; it needn't necessarily reflect correct theology. Notice we have Christophobia in the category of Christianity. Why the hostility? I am not making a bad statement about Christianity (and if I did, I would be a hypocrite, seeing as I am an avid Christian myself). TheEvilSpartan 13:39, 8 January 2008 (EST)