I made a few corrections of wild inaccuracies. For instance, half-life is basically a physical constant, not a guess. Nuclear decay is real, not some geologists fantasy. If nuclear decay is real, and our machines that measure these things are not imaginary, then radiocarbon dating is true, at least as a technique. It is not equally accurate in all times. PalMD
Seems fair. Muchodelcrazy 20:19, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
Excellent corretions, Mathematica.--PalMDtalk 09:45, 8 April 2007 (EDT)