Talk:Preachology

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Small Talk

Is it April 1 already? Humblpi 09:38, 31 March 2008 (EDT)

Actually, yes. Philip J. Rayment 00:41, 1 April 2008 (Australian Eastern Daylight Time)
That explains it, then! Humblpi 09:42, 31 March 2008 (EDT)

No, it is no longer April 1st. However, it is nearly April 15th, better known as the day we fools send Uncle Sam a receipt for the money he stole from us. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wired4jesus (talk)

It was, of course, 1st April when those posts were made (where I am at least). And I don't plan on sending uncle Sam any money at all. In fact, I don't even have an uncle Sam. :-) Philip J. Rayment 21:13, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
By all means, if you have no Uncle Sam, than don't send him any money. Unless of course it is April 1st, and then just send it to me. Wired4jesus 01:44, 12 April 2008 (EDT)

Preaching is a "science"

At the risk of 90/10 repercussions, I have re re-edited back to my original word science in the opening statement on the Preachology article. Preaching would be classified as a social science. The effects of preaching can be measured. A study was conducted within a Church congregation on the effects of preaching, The eighty two participants were tested in five categories: knowledge, pseudo-behavior, a subjective evaluation on the participant's act of worship, a subjective evaluation of the preacher, and semantic differential. [1]Wired4jesus 00:45, 14 April 2008 (EDT)