Talk:Gödel's completeness theorem
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
the article now makes no sense at all. recommend speedy delete. {{Speedy}}RJJensen 10:55, 9 December 2009 (EST)
- Apparently, Godel's completeness theorem is real; it was just stated incorrectly. I fixed it so it's now correct. I don't think I could do more right now since I don't really understand it, but we should keep it because it's real, apparently important, and can be improved. --EvanW 12:37, 9 December 2009 (EST)
- it needs more fixing--in current form it doesn't tell the reader anything. I dropped the blasphemy about Goedel claiming to be God (with a bad link, no less). RJJensen 12:42, 9 December 2009 (EST)
- Well, I'd say it at least tells the reader something :) , but it does need more work. When I get more time, I'll try to read up on it and say more. Of course, if you want to do it first, no problem! --EvanW 12:54, 9 December 2009 (EST)
- it needs more fixing--in current form it doesn't tell the reader anything. I dropped the blasphemy about Goedel claiming to be God (with a bad link, no less). RJJensen 12:42, 9 December 2009 (EST)