Talk:Essay: What is the difference between Joe Stalin and Richard Dawkins?

Yawn. Try listening to the discussion again. Dawkins didn't say that he isn't an atheist. In fact he most certainly is an atheist. You are making a very fundamental misunderstanding here: you're believing what you want to be true instead of what the evidence suggests. Dawkins is both atheist and agnostic. So am I. So are most atheists.--JJLydon 23:38, 10 March 2012 (EST)

God created human language and words have meaning despite atheist protestations.[1] Have you seen Conservapedia's article Atheism and deception? By the way, Charles Darwin’s casual mentioning of a ‘creator’ in earlier editions of his racist work On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (despite Darwin not being a theist at the time) appears to have been a merely a deceptive ploy to downplay the implications of his materialistic hypothesis and his private notebooks confirm this. [2] Conservative 23:58, 10 March 2012 (EST)

• The video "Richard Dawkins said he is an agnostic - NOT atheist" does not work. Please remove it.--JoeyJ 10:33, 5 February 2014 (EST)