Talk:Debate:Do agnostics have proof and evidence that agnosticism is valid?

From Conservapedia

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Proof and evidence? Please explain the difference. --HoosierinPA 15:44, 29 June 2012 (EDT)

This might be a Shockofgod-ism, but since I do not watch his videos, I couldn't say what he means by this. I would, myself, interpret the distinction as follows:

Proof is argument from a priori principles, deductive reasoning
Evidence is argument from observations, inductive reasoning

GregG 17:07, 29 June 2012 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Debate:Do_agnostics_have_proof_and_evidence_that_agnosticism_is_valid%3F&oldid=990592"