Talk:Christopher Wray

There are times when critics of Conservapedia point out the rabid stupidity of certain articles on the website. This article is one of them. Who is their right mind would use a photoshopped picture of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to libel Judge Bruce Reinhart? Even Sean Hannity thinks this photo being used on Fox News is incredibly stupid. Another thing. If Trump issued an executive order to declassify all documents he allegedly took to Mar-a-Lago, what is the order number? [1] Don’t bother looking, you won’t find this mythical executive order. There is a procedure to declassify classified documents and information, but the funny thing is, Trump waving his hand like a Jedi and saying ‘declassify’ is not a part of it. [2] I sure hope the incredibly stupid edits will be removed, but I predict this will not happen. --LSimons (talk) 16:03, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

The DNI says otherwise. RobS^{Ich bin ein breakfast taco} 17:45, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

DNI says what? Libeling people with photoshopped images is the way things ought to be done? I know the DNI does not authorize anyone to belch out 'declassify' to declassify TS documents. Or do you have a credible reference that will put me in my place? --LSimons (talk) 18:01, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

Even CNN legal analysts say SCOTUS will side with Trump. [3] As to the DNI, both Grenell & Ratcliffe back up Trump's statement. It should be noted in this particular case, Trump delegated declassification orders to the AG (Bill Barr) to avoid a conflict of interest, subordinating the DNI to the AG for this particular matter.

As to allegations of "photoshopping", like the Trump pee tape, it's an ongoing investigation that can't be commented on. RobS^{Ich bin ein breakfast taco} 18:28, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

Then we have an issue with a possible conflict of interest with federal magistrate Bruce Reinhart, who defended Epstein co-conspirators, if indeed the Epstein client list was among the declassified DOJ documents. RobS^{Ich bin ein breakfast taco} 18:35, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

Rob has used the authentic image from Reinhart's Facebook, not the daft shoop that Kilmeade threw up on Fox. You can safely disregard everything else he says on this (and most other) subject(s), though. ConwayIII (talk) 19:00, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

Thanks for providing the link. Your contribution to the investigation into the authenticity of the photo is invaluable. Conservapedia thanks you and posterity thanks you. RobS^{Ich bin ein breakfast taco} 19:19, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

Nee bother. Here's the piss-poor shoop with Ms. Maxwell for comparison. ConwayIII (talk) 19:35, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

She looks good for a woman her age. RobS^{Ich bin ein breakfast taco} 19:53, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

Indeed. Bipartisan approval. ConwayIII (talk) 20:09, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

Wow!!! You give me a load of crap for not using your favorite sources for references then you simply quote the Communist News Network to justify Trumps actions? At the two-minute mark of your unimpeachable source, the analysts mentioned Trump better be able to provide the evidence that he declassified the material.

What Grenell and Ratcliffe said about Trump declassifying state secrets is not the issue. Where is the evidence that he did so before leaving office? If Trump actually declassified the documents, one of his minions would have simply stamped the papers as unclassified. Do you actually think a court will believe a man like Trump? What I find absolutely hilarious is you believing any explanation that exonerates your precious Trump no matter how implausible the tale. Oh yeah, Trump avoiding a conflict of interest? That’s funny

Where is your evidence that Trump delegated classification authority to Barr? By the way, no delegation was needed, Barr was already a classification authority. [4] Where is your evidence that Barr declassified the documents Trump possessed before resigning on December 23, 2020?

Conservapedia has an on-going investigation on the photoshopping bilge? Reinhart has a conflict of interest with Trump because of Epstein? An Epstein client list in the folders confiscated by the FBI? How do you dream up this utter nonsense?

I’m trying to improve this article; you’re doing the opposite and making Conservapedia look stupid. I tried and failed. --LSimons (talk) 19:24, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

Kash Patal says the same thing, yes indeed the President possess those Jedi powers. (Beginning about 9:00 in.)

The initial declassification order came down in May 2019, [5] shortly after the Mueller probe ended. So this is old news. Trump reaffirmed the order on January 20, 2021 before leaving office. [6]

Executive order 13526 is the process of declassification. RobS^{Ich bin ein breakfast taco} 19:50, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

Trump threatens to declassify ‘devastating’ docs about Democrats, New York Post, November 28, 2018. The Mueller probe ended the following April. Trump signed the declassification order a month later. RobS^{Ich bin ein breakfast taco} 20:39, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

What we have here is a replay of the Mueller probe; the purpose is not to find any misbehavior by Trump, but to cover up illegal FBI and DOJ-NSD activity (while impugning Trump's reputation). RobS^{Ich bin ein breakfast taco} 20:42, August 16, 2022 (EDT)

Then of course there also is the attempt to connect non-criminal violations of the Presidential Records Act to the J6 witch-hunts, which will undoubtably also garner more public speculation. RobS^{Ich bin ein breakfast taco} 22:24, August 16, 2022 (EDT)