Is this a case of a one-word mistake? Or does everyone think Haig was really unclear about the line of succession? I'd like to see the political affiliations of those who think each way:
- that he was referring to who was "in charge" at the moment
- that he was referring to who would be appointed president should Reagan die
Let's get this cleared up, Wikipedia is no help. --Ed Poor Talk 17:51, 5 March 2010 (EST)