Changes
:Hi Maratrean, The [[Big Bang theory]] is not a theory in scientific sense since it is not verifyable, which is required from all "scientific" theories. It is only a (lame) hypothesis that the universe came about in such way. In my opinion it is just a creationist fairy tale proposing how it could happen if the universse were not eternal (as it most likely is), and if there was a way of creating energy out of nothing. The later thing is necessary for such a "BB universe" to exist, and for several reasons. (i) If there was no universe in its place and it got created "somehow" the energy had to be supplied. (ii) If it already started function as we see it now, it needs constant supply of energy to compensate for constant loss of energy of photons for "dynamical friction" which is a problem for any moving objects in the universe with which it interacts gravitationally. Even photons need this energy delievered, as I described [http://www.fuw.edu.pl/~wjast/160.htm it here]. Besides the above paper explains all the observations so that the Big Bang hypothesis is not needed any more. [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 15:39, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
::Hi JJ. I hope you fit in here. I suspect your ideas will be welcomed here more than at certain other places. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 14:45, 17 July 2011 (EDT)