Changes
H2. They didn’t have a lot in common for instance the Hamilton v. Burr was more of a personal hatred them a political rivalry. Jefferson v. Adams and Lincoln v. Douglas were true political Rivalries from which America benefited from. In the Lincoln v. Douglas rivalry it ended as soon as Lincoln was elected President in which Douglas nearly became a second vice president, even helping support the war effort.
H3. The South could not of won the Civil War for three reasons: lack of manufacturing, poor leadership, and no international help. With no manufacturing capability the Confederacy couldn’t build a navy nor equip their forts with proper artillery. It also meant that they struggled to improve and repair the rail lines decreasing their ability to supply their armies. Having only two good generals (of which one died in 1863) and few good officers cost them the entire west and many battles in the east. The Confederacy had counted on the British or French joining the war. In order to make that happen the Confederacy stopped exporting cotton. However Egypt also supplied cotton making the Confederacies choice ineffective and British and French were more reliant on the Unions corn then the Confederacies cotton. Without any help, under blockade, and losing battles left and right the Confederacy didn’t have the manpower needed to fight let alone win a war.
H4. In order for a slogan to work it has to be short, catchy, and somewhat true. It also need to be directed at someone how wasn’t particularly good at his job or made an obvious error.
AnthonyF
