5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + + + + + +
Talk:Internet parodist (view source)
Revision as of 01:44, October 25, 2008
, 01:44, October 25, 2008→Second half of article: new section
How come the article changes from the convention of not capitalizing the names of political viewpoitns (Here being conservative and liberal) to capitalizing them in the last section of the article? Is this stylistic, or should it be fixed? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 11:51, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
How come the article changes from the convention of not capitalizing the names of political viewpoitns (Here being conservative and liberal) to capitalizing them in the last section of the article? Is this stylistic, or should it be fixed? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 11:51, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
: Different editor. Should probably be fixed. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 11:53, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
: Different editor. Should probably be fixed. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 11:53, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
== Second half of article ==
The long paragraph that starts with "one wonders" is basically just speculation (as evidenced by the use of the phrase "one wonders"), and the refs are... strange to say the least. One ref is a viral promotion of a politicized documentary, one is a comment in a forum, and another is a blog.
I'm not sure what the purpose of the last section is. Possible explanations of what? I would think it would be "possible explanations that people parody on the internet", but then the "liberal perspective" list doesn't make any sense. And again, this section is just speculation, as evidenced by the use of the phrase "possible explanations". I think both of these paragraphs should be either removed (my preference) or substantially rewritten. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 21:44, 24 October 2008 (EDT)