nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: + +
Talk:Internet parodist (view source)
Revision as of 22:41, October 24, 2008
, 22:41, October 24, 2008Clarifying
::::You're right, Ungtss - ultimately, the joke is on them, not least because they are mentally ill-equipped even to understand the ideas which they are attempting to mock. That's why they are so easy to spot and deal with. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 11:03, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
::::You're right, Ungtss - ultimately, the joke is on them, not least because they are mentally ill-equipped even to understand the ideas which they are attempting to mock. That's why they are so easy to spot and deal with. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 11:03, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::Easy for some to spot. Not for others. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 11:38, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::Easy for some to spot. Not for others. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 11:38, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
::::I agree with Ungtss's 10:59 reply; I guess I didn't make it clear enough, but I was talking about ''deceitful'' parody, not parody/satire that is clearly that, and which most people would not mistake. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:41, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
I am a rotten liberal, atheist but I still feel that I basically agree with the gist of this article. I feel that it is perfectly legitimate to edit or debate or even to use humor or sarcasm on Conservapedia but I think to disguise yourself as a parodists or to be a vandal is pretty unproductive. [[User:MichaelFAnderson|MichaelFAnderson]] 10:08, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
I am a rotten liberal, atheist but I still feel that I basically agree with the gist of this article. I feel that it is perfectly legitimate to edit or debate or even to use humor or sarcasm on Conservapedia but I think to disguise yourself as a parodists or to be a vandal is pretty unproductive. [[User:MichaelFAnderson|MichaelFAnderson]] 10:08, 24 October 2008 (EDT)