Changes

::I disagree with Philip. There have been great CPOV parodies and satires, but they are designed to enlighten, and maybe to jerk Liberals into an appreciation of reality. Liberal parodies, especially the rubbish we have to put up with here, are designed simply to damage, with no kind of intellectual underpinning or ''finesse''. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 10:48, 24 October 2008 (EDT)

::I disagree with Philip. There have been great CPOV parodies and satires, but they are designed to enlighten, and maybe to jerk Liberals into an appreciation of reality. Liberal parodies, especially the rubbish we have to put up with here, are designed simply to damage, with no kind of intellectual underpinning or ''finesse''. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 10:48, 24 October 2008 (EDT)

::I am a rotten liberal, atheist but I still feel that I basically agree with the gist of this article.  I feel that it is perfectly legitimate to edit or debate or even to use humor or sarcasm on Conservapedia but I think to disguise yourself as a parodists or to be a vandal is pretty unproductive.  [[User:MichaelFAnderson|MichaelFAnderson]] 10:08, 24 October 2008 (EDT)

:::I am a rotten liberal, atheist but I still feel that I basically agree with the gist of this article.  I feel that it is perfectly legitimate to edit or debate or even to use humor or sarcasm on Conservapedia but I think to disguise yourself as a parodists or to be a vandal is pretty unproductive.  [[User:MichaelFAnderson|MichaelFAnderson]] 10:08, 24 October 2008 (EDT)