3,303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + +
Talk:Internet parodist (view source)
Revision as of 14:48, October 24, 2008
, 14:48, October 24, 2008no edit summary
'One simply does not find conservative parodists on liberal forums, and one wonders if perhaps that fact may reflect on the psychological underpinnings of the liberal point of view.'
''One simply does not find conservative parodists on liberal forums, and one wonders if perhaps that fact may reflect on the psychological underpinnings of the liberal point of view.''
Is this not perhaps because so much of Liberal ideology is beyond parody? In the words of the Conservative British commentator Richard Littlejohn, "You couldn't make it up". [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 04:50, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
Is this not perhaps because so much of Liberal ideology is beyond parody? In the words of the Conservative British commentator Richard Littlejohn, "You couldn't make it up". [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 04:50, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
: I would assume that it's because conservatives have standards than discourage them from deceiving. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:04, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
: I would assume that it's because conservatives have standards than discourage them from deceiving. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:04, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
::I disagree with Philip. There have been great CPOV parodies and satires, but they are designed to enlighten, and maybe to jerk Liberals into an appreciation of reality. Liberal parodies, especially the rubbish we have to put up with here, are designed simply to damage, with no kind of intellectual underpinning or ''finesse''. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 10:48, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
::I am a rotten liberal, atheist but I still feel that I basically agree with the gist of this article. I feel that it is perfectly legitimate to edit or debate or even to use humor or sarcasm on Conservapedia but I think to disguise yourself as a parodists or to be a vandal is pretty unproductive. [[User:MichaelFAnderson|MichaelFAnderson]] 10:08, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
::I am a rotten liberal, atheist but I still feel that I basically agree with the gist of this article. I feel that it is perfectly legitimate to edit or debate or even to use humor or sarcasm on Conservapedia but I think to disguise yourself as a parodists or to be a vandal is pretty unproductive. [[User:MichaelFAnderson|MichaelFAnderson]] 10:08, 24 October 2008 (EDT)