Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Supplied explanation for previous edit.
Line 45: Line 45:  
::And lastly, there is nothing inherently "liberal" about UFO sightings or their investigations.[[User:CPlantin|CPlantin]] 17:16, 3 April, 2008 (CDT)
 
::And lastly, there is nothing inherently "liberal" about UFO sightings or their investigations.[[User:CPlantin|CPlantin]] 17:16, 3 April, 2008 (CDT)
   −
Sure, the article is flawed. So let's fix it, instead of censoring it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:39, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
+
Sure, the article is flawed. So let's fix it, instead of censoring it.--[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:39, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
: OK, I did't feel I was censoring the article and am happy to work toward a rational outcome.  I had never removed much before (maybe punctuation or things from one list to another) and didn't realize that it would be understood to be an effort at censorship. I did try to justify it in the talk section, though.  Next time I'll wait for input from interested parties and we could arrive at a decision to take something out together. [[User:CPlantin|CPlantin]] 17:16, 3 April, 2008 (CDT)
    
==Global Warming==
 
==Global Warming==
    
Under the definition we give for global warming in our article (we give the "non controversial definition"), we would be hard pressed to label it like this... see my comment on [[Talk: Global warming]] [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:08, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 
Under the definition we give for global warming in our article (we give the "non controversial definition"), we would be hard pressed to label it like this... see my comment on [[Talk: Global warming]] [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:08, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
88

edits

Navigation menu