Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 44:
Line 44: + +
Talk:Essay:Liberal Falsehoods (view source)
Revision as of 22:39, April 3, 2008
, 22:39, April 3, 2008so fix it
::It is incorrect to imply that support of the space program, including exploratory missions, constituted an opinion that LGM "must" exist and we must spend billions to find them. There are plenty of legit reasons to explore space, the oceans, and other areas we don't know much about, and many believe that much of that is worthy of government support.
::It is incorrect to imply that support of the space program, including exploratory missions, constituted an opinion that LGM "must" exist and we must spend billions to find them. There are plenty of legit reasons to explore space, the oceans, and other areas we don't know much about, and many believe that much of that is worthy of government support.
::And lastly, there is nothing inherently "liberal" about UFO sightings or their investigations.[[User:CPlantin|CPlantin]] 17:16, 3 April, 2008 (CDT)
::And lastly, there is nothing inherently "liberal" about UFO sightings or their investigations.[[User:CPlantin|CPlantin]] 17:16, 3 April, 2008 (CDT)
Sure, the article is flawed. So let's fix it, instead of censoring it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:39, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
==Global Warming==
==Global Warming==
Under the definition we give for global warming in our article (we give the "non controversial definition"), we would be hard pressed to label it like this... see my comment on [[Talk: Global warming]] [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:08, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
Under the definition we give for global warming in our article (we give the "non controversial definition"), we would be hard pressed to label it like this... see my comment on [[Talk: Global warming]] [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:08, 21 May 2007 (EDT)