::[[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 12:04, 30 November 2007 (EST)
::: It was the last word in your debate with Order. I had not been part of that debate.::: I'm not suggesting that Order's initial edit was a good one. I simply don't know, because it's not something that I know anything about nor am I interested in, although given that you and I have a similar ideology and Order has a quite different one, I might side with you on that if I knew anything about it.::: I'm saying that it was not out of order for him to make his initial edit without discussing it, and that if you disagreed, then you should have (a) edited it further, (b) discussed it on the talk page, or (c) reverted it whilst supplying a good reason for reverting. Instead you revered ''without'' supplying a valid reason, something that should be kept for occasions when the reason is obvious, such as vandalism. Saying that he should have discussed it before making the edit not a valid reason, as he is not obliged to discuss every edit before making a change.::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:39, 1 December 2007 (EST)
Perhaps one (or both?) of you need(s) to reread [[Help:Editing Etiquette|Editing Etiquette]]. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:37, 27 November 2007 (EST)
