Changes
/* Debate and rhetorical tactics */
*[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-lois-capps/when-silence-speaks-volum_b_98601.html When silence speaks volumes], Huffington Post
*[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/sen-mitch-mcconnell-his_b_38699.html Another Huffington Post example of When silence speaks volumes]</ref>
#Calls something disliked a "conspiracy theory," but don't use that term against wacky liberal theories like "[[global warming]]"or the claim the Russia "hacked" the 2016 presidential election (they thought such a claim was silly when it appeared Trump would loose but changed their minds after he won).
#Responds with "sigh" when presented with repeated examples of harm caused by liberal culture, yet persist in denying the harm despite overwhelming evidence.
#Uses [[condescension]] against a conservative opponent to belittle the conservative and his viewpoints and to avoid addressing a subject for which the liberal has no logical response.
[http://www.conservapedia.com/Template_talk:Examples_of_liberal_bias#Its_just_funny]</ref><ref>"The toilets overflowed at school today...if only the [[liberal]]s had allowed religion in school, this never would have happened." BillOhannity on October 1, 2007</ref> even resorting to outright abuse when mockery fails
#Uses non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that liberals over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]]. But their example does not help their argument. Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that liberals do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism). Think about that.
#Draws an analogy between opponents and racistsand/or Nazis, no matter how illogicalor hypocritical.
#Deleting a comment, and with it the entire comment thread stemming from it, in an online article's comment section in an attempt to save face if the liberal realizes they have lost an argument they had with a conservative on that thread.
