Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
300 bytes added ,  20:30, March 2, 2013
→‎Obama: Yes, its a problem
Line 17: Line 17:     
I think it might be worth considering if we need two articles on Sequestration, or if we should use a merge and redirect scheme.  I don't have a made up mind either way, but I thought it might be worth talking about.  Your thoughts?  Thanks, [[User:WilliamWB|WilliamWB]] 15:25, 2 March 2013 (EST)
 
I think it might be worth considering if we need two articles on Sequestration, or if we should use a merge and redirect scheme.  I don't have a made up mind either way, but I thought it might be worth talking about.  Your thoughts?  Thanks, [[User:WilliamWB|WilliamWB]] 15:25, 2 March 2013 (EST)
 +
:I'm beginning to loose count how many there are (see post at Talk/MP). Yes, it is a problem. The main sequestration article is in category legal terms, so fixing sequester & sequestration should begin there, w/redirs to a disambig, don't you think?  [[User:OscarO|OscarO]] 15:30, 2 March 2013 (EST)
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,275

edits

Navigation menu