Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Early voting (view source)

Revision as of 02:19, November 23, 2012

439 bytes added ,  02:19, November 23, 2012
→‎How exactly does it disenfranchise?: If 99% of the electorate vote early before campaigns are over, then the conscientious voter who does his due diligence by voting on Election Day has been dise
Line 57: Line 57:     
If the process is entirely voluntary and allows people to vote who otherwise might not be able to do, how is it in any way hindering others from voting? Is it somehow more sacrosanct to vote a month later? [[User:SteveSpagnola|SteveSpagnola]] 21:05, 22 November 2012 (EST)
 
If the process is entirely voluntary and allows people to vote who otherwise might not be able to do, how is it in any way hindering others from voting? Is it somehow more sacrosanct to vote a month later? [[User:SteveSpagnola|SteveSpagnola]] 21:05, 22 November 2012 (EST)
 +
 +
:Not "more sancrosanct," but more informed to vote on [[Election Day]].  If 99% of the electorate vote early before campaigns are over, then the conscientious voter who does his due diligence by voting on Election Day has been disenfranchised from his vote being meaningful.  To the extent early voting is less than 99%, the degree of disenfranchisement scales accordingly.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:19, 22 November 2012 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,330

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1020178"

Navigation menu