43
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53:
Line 53: + + + +
→How exactly does it disenfranchise?: new section
'''EDITED TO ADD''': Incidentally, you might be interested to know that Georgia's 2005 photo ID act (HB 244, Act 53) also instituted no-excuse absentee voting. Additionally, from my reading of the trial documents in ''South Carolina v. U.S.'', the supporters of photo voter ID saw no-excuse absentee voting as a concession that could be offered to secure compromise. [[User:GregG|GregG]] 20:59, 13 November 2012 (EST)
'''EDITED TO ADD''': Incidentally, you might be interested to know that Georgia's 2005 photo ID act (HB 244, Act 53) also instituted no-excuse absentee voting. Additionally, from my reading of the trial documents in ''South Carolina v. U.S.'', the supporters of photo voter ID saw no-excuse absentee voting as a concession that could be offered to secure compromise. [[User:GregG|GregG]] 20:59, 13 November 2012 (EST)
== How exactly does it disenfranchise? ==
If the process is entirely voluntary and allows people to vote who otherwise might not be able to do, how is it in any way hindering others from voting? Is it somehow more sacrosanct to vote a month later? [[User:SteveSpagnola|SteveSpagnola]] 21:05, 22 November 2012 (EST)