Page history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Debate:Was the media attention needed?

January 4, 2009

JessicaT
Conservapedia:Was the media attention needed? moved to Debate:Was the media attention needed?
m
05:58

January 16, 2008

Falcifer
no edit summary
21:53
+158

July 23, 2007

Dollanganger
→‎The attention was needed
14:44
+177

March 28, 2007

Tsumetai
no edit summary
12:22
+12

March 21, 2007

Dugless mcspud59
→‎Conservapedia shouldn't have had any media coverage for the sake of protecting pages
20:57
+71
Dugless mcspud59
→‎Conservapedia shouldn't have had any media coverage for the sake of protecting pages
20:57
+93
Kara
no edit summary
14:20
+191
Ymmotrojam
no edit summary
03:30
+227
AmesG
→‎It was needed to spread the "gospel" of Conservapedia
03:30
+154
Eiyuu Kou
→‎It was needed to spread the "gospel" of Conservapedia
03:29
+10
Eiyuu Kou
→‎It was needed to spread the gospel of Conservapedia
03:28
+2
Sulgran
no edit summary
03:27
+51
Myk
corrected spelling
m
03:26
+72
Eiyuu Kou
New page: I discovered Conservapedia from the media but it has also seems to have attracted unwanted attention. Do you think we really needed all that coverage? --~~~~ == It was needed to spread th...
03:03
+499

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:History/Debate:Was_the_media_attention_needed%3F"

Navigation menu