Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
← Older edit
Newer edit →
Debate:Was the media attention needed?
(view source)
Revision as of 20:57, March 21, 2007
93 bytes added
,
20:57, March 21, 2007
→Conservapedia shouldn't have had any media coverage for the sake of protecting pages
Line 16:
Line 16:
[[User:Sulgran|Sulgran]] 23:27, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
[[User:Sulgran|Sulgran]] 23:27, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
== Conservapedia shouldn't have had any media coverage for the sake of protecting pages ==
== Conservapedia shouldn't have had any media coverage for the sake of protecting pages ==
+
why do you have to " protect" anything, just provide facts, not spin and you should be okay.
Dugless mcspud59
19
edits
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
talk page
Variants
Views
Read
View source
View history
More
Search
Popular Links
Main Page
Recent changes
New Pages
Random page
Statistics
Edit Console
Special pages
Printable version