User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 14:12, July 25, 2008 diff hist +1,276 Talk:Letter to PNAS
- 18:01, May 14, 2008 diff hist +12 Europe If we're talking about major empires stemming from Europe, I figure the British one should be included.
- 21:31, April 30, 2008 diff hist +763 Talk:Evolutionism
- 21:08, April 30, 2008 diff hist +291 Talk:Evolutionism
- 19:39, April 29, 2008 diff hist +230 Guardian (UK)
- 19:32, April 29, 2008 diff hist +21 The Times of London Just adding it's a respected paper over here.
- 16:59, April 28, 2008 diff hist +513 New! Talk:Natural law theory New page: Any sane person, that has never experienced orgasm perhaps. Sorry, but if you are convinced it's solely for reproduction, then why do both men and women experience orgasm, a great sense o...
- 11:12, April 15, 2008 diff hist +340 Talk:Feminist style
- 06:16, April 10, 2008 diff hist +2,103 Talk:Biology and creation
- 18:01, April 9, 2008 diff hist +1,229 Talk:Biology and creation
- 16:45, April 9, 2008 diff hist +701 New! Talk:Biology and creation New page: Surely we need to qualify young earth and old earth creationists here? Because young earth creationists cannot agree with the biology of mutation rates, unless somehow suggesting that mut...
- 11:33, April 9, 2008 diff hist -73 Illegal aliens Qualified statement about mexicans, and removed one about canadians, austrailians and british until we have a citation.
- 11:31, April 9, 2008 diff hist -17 Illegal aliens Not just the US that they cross borders etc, it applies everywhere
- 14:59, April 8, 2008 diff hist +2,107 New! Talk:Intelligent design controversy New page: "In fact, evolutionists have no answer to ID's arguments and therefore refuse to deal forthrightly with it's proponents." ID eventually comes down to a godlike figure, which is supernatur...
- 13:10, March 19, 2008 diff hist +172 Talk:Spanish Inquisition
- 13:06, March 19, 2008 diff hist +321 Talk:Methodological naturalism
- 21:55, March 13, 2008 diff hist +166 Bodybuilding It focuses on particular muscles, not the whole body, also added another famous competitor.
- 21:52, March 13, 2008 diff hist +705 Talk:Air temperature and carbon dioxide
- 17:02, March 3, 2008 diff hist +474 Talk:Cattle →Christian relevance? current
- 12:56, February 28, 2008 diff hist -11 Debate:How should we view the fact leading scientists do not believe in God?
- 12:54, February 28, 2008 diff hist +3,795 Debate:How should we view the fact leading scientists do not believe in God?
- 12:13, February 28, 2008 diff hist +2,476 Debate:How should we view the fact leading scientists do not believe in God?
- 11:30, February 28, 2008 diff hist +51 Debate:How should we view the fact leading scientists do not believe in God?
- 11:30, February 28, 2008 diff hist +748 New! Debate:How should we view the fact leading scientists do not believe in God? New page: With the leading scientists of America (I believe the British numbers are even higher), professing non-belief to a huge majority. And masses of scientists from leading universities of Amer...
- 11:28, February 28, 2008 diff hist +83 Conservapedia:Debate Topics →Other
- 20:33, February 25, 2008 diff hist -2 Ribosome
- 20:19, February 25, 2008 diff hist +876 Conservapedia talk:Debate Topics Want to add a debate