User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 14:37, July 30, 2019 diff hist +19 Talk:Abd ul-Rahman Lomax might as well emphasize this
- 14:35, July 30, 2019 diff hist +6 Talk:Abd ul-Rahman Lomax Make this more noticeable
- 12:17, July 30, 2019 diff hist +1,273 Talk:Abd ul-Rahman Lomax →Article creator: clues
- 00:55, July 30, 2019 diff hist -11 Talk:Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- 00:51, July 30, 2019 diff hist +70 User talk:Abd →socks and impersonations: sign it! current
- 00:51, July 30, 2019 diff hist +34 User talk:Abd
- 00:46, July 30, 2019 diff hist +4,828 Talk:Abd ul-Rahman Lomax about the creation of this article on me and fact
- 22:49, July 29, 2019 diff hist +47 User talk:Abd →socks and impersonations
- 22:46, July 29, 2019 diff hist +297 User talk:Abd →socks and impersonations: new section
- 14:43, October 25, 2012 diff hist +280 Cold fusion →Recent coverage: Forbes article
- 23:13, October 24, 2012 diff hist +534 Cold fusion add a new article from Popular Science
- 18:12, September 26, 2012 diff hist -10 Cold fusion →Nuclear Fusion: true for all nuclei
- 18:11, September 26, 2012 diff hist -12 Cold fusion →Nuclear Fusion: other forms *are* possible
- 18:11, September 26, 2012 diff hist +481 Cold fusion →Nuclear Fusion: add
- 03:08, September 5, 2012 diff hist -78 Cold fusion →High Temperature Fusion: This source is not really a general source on hot fusion and is not in any way authoritative
- 03:03, September 5, 2012 diff hist -4 Cold fusion →Fleischmann Pons: clean up
- 02:59, September 5, 2012 diff hist 0 m Cold fusion →Low Temperature Fusion: rm cap
- 23:59, September 4, 2012 diff hist +12 Cold fusion →Low Temperature Fusion: muon-catalyzed fusion is a known and accepted efffect, not controversial
- 23:54, September 4, 2012 diff hist +70 Cold fusion →Low Temperature Fusion: remove hidden assumption by supplementing
- 23:52, September 4, 2012 diff hist -170 Cold fusion →High Temperature Fusion: self-sustaining isn't a direct consequence of achieving hot fusion. On earth,hot fusion isn't self-sustaining, generally.
- 23:50, September 4, 2012 diff hist +269 Cold fusion →Nuclear Fusion: more accurate
- 23:40, August 9, 2012 diff hist +3,513 User talk:Abd →Cold Fusion.: Is this really a good example of "structural problems on Wikipedia"?
- 01:10, August 7, 2012 diff hist +1,170 Cold fusion reorganize a bit, add a source for the loading information. Comment on the Naturwissenschaften review.
- 23:19, August 5, 2012 diff hist +161 User talk:Abd →the other place: popcorn in the microwave
- 21:57, August 5, 2012 diff hist +126 User talk:Brenden →Participate in Cold fusion?: Thanks.
- 19:23, August 5, 2012 diff hist +203 User talk:Abd →the other place: aw, ruined my day.
- 18:44, August 5, 2012 diff hist +357 User talk:Abd →Cold Fusion.: Just noticed that the one advocating this "netball" thing was you... I had no idea.
- 18:06, August 5, 2012 diff hist +46 m Theocracy →Theocracy as tyranny: grammar, explain "Sharia law" is redundant in this case.
- 18:00, August 5, 2012 diff hist +2,777 User talk:Brenden →Participate in Cold fusion?: new section
- 17:29, August 5, 2012 diff hist +5,721 User talk:Abd →Cold Fusion.: thanks, Wschact. I looked at the page you mention. I'm not eager to dive in.
- 06:58, August 5, 2012 diff hist +2,749 Talk:Cold fusion →repeated restoration of plagiarized text: new section current
- 06:42, August 5, 2012 diff hist +9 Cold fusion I poke the eye out of the URL to avoid the spam trap, those captchas often are illegible. Here goes it the restoration.
- 06:40, August 5, 2012 diff hist -1,150 Cold fusion Undo revision 998343 by Brenden (talk)This edit restored poor text copied from another wiki. Please respect the request on the Talk page.
- 06:36, August 5, 2012 diff hist +10,126 User talk:Abd →Cold Fusion.: reply to Brenden. Please read up on this, I can provide suggested sources. Starting with the review I link to, which is the most comprehensive journal review ever on cold fusion.
- 19:14, August 2, 2012 diff hist +687 User talk:Michaeldsuarez →Email addresses?: looks like email was disabled, all right. Lots of references to it in old pages. current
- 16:52, August 2, 2012 diff hist +158 User talk:Michaeldsuarez →Email addresses?: new section
- 00:39, August 2, 2012 diff hist +62 User talk:Abd Thanks, Michael. I'm the Wikipedia editor Abd that you know.
- 00:22, August 2, 2012 diff hist -1,141 Cold fusion Undo revision 997498 by Conservative (talk)Correct apparent error. This removes plagiarized content.
- 00:21, August 2, 2012 diff hist +554 Talk:Cold fusion Okay, will restore original content, removing plagiarized content apparently restored in error.
- 00:36, August 1, 2012 diff hist +1 User talk:Edpell →Cold Fusion: format current
- 00:36, August 1, 2012 diff hist +3,163 User talk:Edpell →Cold Fusion: respond to the comment made here, apparently Edpell didn't notice this or the edits.
- 00:17, August 1, 2012 diff hist +660 Cold fusion clean this up. better. Remove weak source, refer to definitive recent review.
- 23:59, July 31, 2012 diff hist +9 Cold fusion →References: fix cat
- 23:59, July 31, 2012 diff hist +13 Cold fusion →References: Stereotypically, chemists say cold fusion is not chemistry, and physicists say it's not physics. The experimental work is chemistry, though.
- 23:57, July 31, 2012 diff hist +1,835 Cold fusion →References: It can be argued that Cold fusion is "fringe." Not that it is "pseudoscience." It's testable, it doesn't meet the pseudoscience characteristics at all.